Sunday, 3 August 2014

777 #BAILOUTS FALSE FLAGS #BUILDING7 #FLIGHT77 777 #MH370 MH17 #AH0517 311-777

Not forgetting of course, LONDON 77 ;)   But there is one 777 to which we'd previously been unaware. First, a quick recapt, for the asleep:

Sunday, 6 April 2014

And most recently of course, a sequence, of THREE planes downed:

Thursday, 31 July 2014


But in JANUARY (month ONE);

THE ANCIENT SCIENCE OF NUMEROLOGY You’d be amazed at the shockingly accurate and revealing information that can be deciphered from nothing more than your name and date of birth.  But don’t take my word for it.  Click Here! >> Get your free personalized Numerology Reading here. - See more at:

Friday, 11 July 2014

311 - 777 ;)   Of course, to those unaware, there was no zero a long, long time ago; and thus 777 represents correctly, with a ZERO missing ... 7707th:  And if you don't know about the 7707th, you really should be, if you want to LIVE, that is, reading The White Rabbit, more regularly! ;) 

Oh GO ON then DUMBO; just for you:
"7707th European Command Intelligence Center. Camp King"

"Stock market drops 777 points as House votes down Wall Street bailout

The stock market dropped by 777 points today, in response to the bailout vote in Congress, its largest numerical drop in history. As a percentage of overall volume, the drop did not measure in the top ten – at least not yet. The vote was in response to widespread anger at the proposed bailout of Wall Street. Joining together were right-wing conservatives, middle-of-the-roaders and progressives. Strange bedfellows indeed.

The new proposal modified by rushed weekend negotiations contained provisions to limit corporate golden parachutes and provide greater tax-payer relief and recovery of assets with a form of IOU’s if stocks recover and can be sold for better yields. Included also were insurance measures for bad debts to allay conservative concerns. However when the votes were cast, these provisions were not nearly enough to prevent a Republican revolt from the leadership of George Bush and John McCain, the main cause of the victory of today’s naysayers, The House rejected the package 228 – 205. 133 of the no votes came from Republicans. Only 65 Republicans voted in favor of the measure.

New York Times reporter David Herszenhorn commented that the 65 Republican votes was the “operative number.” The Democrats he continued knew that they needed a bipartisan vote in order to win. Bush and McCain in an enormous display of lame-duck weakness and Republican disarray were unable to muster the needed votes.

House members, up for re-election in just a few weeks in the case of Republicans may have voted their fear and not their pocket books. Ideological considerations may also have played a role with some Republicans seeing the government bailout and intervention as threatening “socialism.”

Operatives in the McCain campaign were quick to blame Democrats and Barack Obama for the vote raising speculation of continuing tactical shenanigans from the Republican side. Many of the no votes came from Gingrich Republicans. Gingrich had been campaigning against the Paulson plan.

Democrats voted against the measure for still other reasons. The Cleveland Plain Dealer's Sabrina Eaton writes that the Ohio’s “Marcy Kaptur, a Toledo Democrat, said the bill would concentrate more financial power into Wall Street megabanks.” On the other hand Dennis Kucinich, a Cleveland Democrat, said 'the bill wouldn't keep more people in their homes because it wouldn't give federal authorities any ability to change mortgage terms to avoid foreclosures. If we had a plan that focuses on saving families' homes, it would actually do more for the economy than this bill,' Kucinich said “What's good for Wall Street is good for Main Street? Not today.”

Similar attitudes were expressed in neighboring Michigan. The Detroit Free Press reported that Congresswoman Cheeks-Kilpatrick said 'the legislation did not go far enough to guarantee that people facing foreclosures would be able to remain in their homes.” Kilpartrick is the chair of the Black Congressional Caucus whose annual legislative weekend ended a few days ago. Much anger at Wall Street was expressed at the event.

Justin Hyde of the Free Press wrote that before the bill was voted on Rep. John Conyers expressed big doubts. Asked what he thought of it, Rep. John Conyers, D-Detroit, said, 'Not much.We're waiting to see how much room there is for improvement,” he said, following a meeting of what some House Democrats called the skeptics' caucus. “I can tell you we haven't gotten one call in 10 days in support of this plan.”

Rep. Barbara Lee of Oakland also expressed similar views according to Oakland Tribune’s Josh Richman: 'First, it does little to address the underlying problem - the foreclosure crisis. We need a moratorium on foreclosures and bankruptcy reform to help people stay in their homes. Second, this bill should be paid for by the high-flying industry that created this problem.”

Richman also reported that a study done by a Berkley outfit that analyses money in politics that Democrats and Republicans who received the largest campaign contributions by banks and financial institutions – some twice – as much, voted in favor of the legislation as compared to those who didn’t:

“MAPLight found the 140 House Democrats voting “yes” received an average of $212,700 each, about twice as much as the average $107,993 for the 95 House Democrats who voted “no.” On the other side of the aisle, the 65 House Republicans voting “yes” received an average of $273,181 each, about 50 percent more than the average $181,688 for the 133 House Republicans voting “no.”

However, it would wrong to conclude that yes votes were simply a matter of campaign contributions as many progressives voted for the bailout with an eye toward the markets and the November election."

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License

Just coincidence, no doubt 777
Don't forget the easier life takeing down the BANKSTERS daily incrementally SAFELY, securely, TOGETHER BECOME  THE BANKS! Solutions for INVESTORS and  BORROWERS clisk:

invest, investor, investing, lending


Just like Jo Biden's son, preparing to drill for shale oil, in Ukraine.

Company In Which Joe Biden's Son Is Director Prepares To Drill Shale Gas In East Ukraine

Recall what we said earlier today: the proxy Ukraine war just like that in Syria preceding it, "is all about energy."
Recall also the following chart showing Ukraine's shale gas deposits, keeping in mind that theDnieper-Donets basinwhich lies in the hotly contested eastern part of the nation and where as everyone knows by now a bloody civil war is raging,is the major oil and gas producing region of Ukraine accounting for approximately 90 per cent of Ukrainian production andaccording to EIA may have 42 tcf of shale gas resources technically recoverable from 197 tcf of risked shale gas in place.
 Finally, recall our story from May that Joe Biden's son, Hunter, just joined the board of the largest Ukraine gas producer Burisma Holdings."  Continues.

UPDATE; we'd forgotten about this 777:

Saturday, 6 July 2013

- See more at:

If you found this post interesting, you'd find this one, FASCINATING:

Saturday, 8 March 2014

- See more at:

The White Rabbit! aka Freeman Money ... ;)

CREATE a new REAL Economic REALITY with SOCIAL ANIMALS! It's FREE! NB: Does NOT Duplicate RSS! Low Volume! For those interested in making, selling and buying products and services that build a better HUMANity! Humanity for HUMANS! v.4U ;)

Dare ... Make New Quantum Neural BRANE Connections?
Latest Top Stories -->> 

No comments :

Post a comment

Only members (obviously) can comment; no moderation; direct to page.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.