Thursday, 2 January 2014


Remember those 'helping' planes; US MILITARY 'Command and Control' 'Doomsday' planes seen flying on 911 .... 'keeping the Nation safe' ... this, you're not going to like, one bit, but this page, may also be one of the most important pages now published, from the 7,800 or so, on site.   Essential backgrounders before you CAN truly make sense of the CRITICAL INFORMATION contained within this page, is contained within the following two posts:

  • #SATELLITETERRORISM Mind Security & Cybernetic Warfare #HAARP

  • And people of the United Kingdom, noting 'British' Telecommunications is intricately complicit in the UNLAWFUL KILLINGS of 'enemies' GIVEN NO TRIALS, may wish to seriously question the MAP we reproduce at the end of this document;

    The Ghost Frequency - Nightmare by PIAS Records

    The page consists of two parts

    1) the original, seminal work on this subject, published in 1991 by the US Military Psychogical Warfare Operations specialist, whose first ever interview, we published a few days ago here, &;

    2) the most shocking PROOF of the ACTUAL USE of these technologies, including PROOF of their EXISTENCE and thus POTENTIAL USE ON 911; by the BUSH (SCHERF) NAZI faction of the US Military which the MILITIA needs to get on, getting on, dealing with; whilst they still have (if they still do) their OWN minds, with which to do so.



    High Frequency - "Believe in Your Head" Raw Lines Music by BlankTV
    First up, the FULL COMPLETE Julia McKinney document;



    by Julianne McKinney

    Director, Electronic Surveillance Project

    Association of National Security Alumni

    December 1992

    Whither the KGB?

            In February 1974, Georgetown University’s Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) hosted discussions on the plight of dissenters in the Soviet Union, and on the means by which the U.S. Government might most effectively intervene. Highlights of these discussions are reported in Understanding the Solzhenitzyn Affair: Dissent and its Control in the USSR (CSIS, 1974).
          KGB strategies were addressed in some detail during these discussions. It was noted that the KGB’s success depended on the extensive use of informant networks and agents provocateurs; and, following Brezhnev’s rise to power, on the use of drugs and psychiatrists for further purposes of manipulation and control. Shadowing, bugging, slandering, blacklisting and other related tactics were also cited as serving KGB purposes. Participants in the conference agreed that the KGB’s obvious intent was to divide and isolate the populace, to spread fear, and to silence dissenters.
          Agencies of our own government are on record as having employed precisely these same tactics on a recurrent basis. The Church and Rockefeller Committee Hearings in the mid-1970’s purportedly put an end to these practices. Based on recent developments, it would appear that the CIA’s and FBI’s Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and Vice-Presidential-level Hearings) were instead merely driven underground. We are now in contact with a total of 25* individuals, scattered throughout the United States, who firmly believe they are being harassed by agencies of the U.S. Government. Others have been brought to our attention whom we will be contacting in the future. The majority of these individuals claim that their harassment and surveillance began in 1989.
          The methods reportedly employed in these harassment campaigns bear a striking resemblance to those attributed to the CIA and FBI during Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The only difference now is that electronic harassment and experimentation also appear to be (more blatantly) involved.
          The Berlin Wall is down, Communism is in the midst of a death rattle, and the KGB no longer poses the threat which purportedly served to justify the U.S. Government’s resort to such operations as MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The KGB, since 1989, has been reduced to an increasingly distant memory.
          Reactivation of surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations in this country suggests that the KGB, as an institution, was never the real threat. A KGB “mentality,” with its underlying pragmatic contempt for civil liberties, appears, instead, to have been the driving force behind MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, and the operations now being reported to us.
          The KGB “mentality” is a matter of personal predilection, not ideology. Its objective is power and control, regardless of human cost. It is a corrupting, cancerous influence, which feeds on fear, conformity and government funding.
          Four months ago, when this Project commenced, we approached these complaints of government harassment and experimentation with an admitted “high degree of caution.” We are no longer skeptical. The growing numbers of independent complaints and the similarities between those complaints cannot be ignored. Under the circumstances, the KGB should be proud of itself. As a “mentality,” the KGB appears to be accomplishing more in “burying this country” from within, than it could ever have hoped to have achieved as an institution. It would appear that this country has a serious problem on its hands which needs to be resolved.
          Part I of this report, which is reprinted from the June-July 1992 edition of the Association’s publication, Unclassified, preliminarily addresses the complaints brought to our attention as of July 1992. Our objective, as noted, was to weigh the legitimacy of those complaints in terms of the directed-energy technologies reportedly involved. Part II discusses the overt and covert patterns of harassment identified as a result of our investigations, to date. A part of our objective, here, is to limit the success of such operations in the future, by according them widespread publicity.
          In Part II, we do not identify individuals by name, both to honor their privacy and because our investigations have not been completed. Part II, like Part I, is a preliminary finding. Our focus is on the similarities of the complaints being received—similarities which Federal and State legislators, the courts, the FBI, local law enforcement agencies, the medical and psychiatric professions, and organizations such as the ACLU and Amnesty International have so far chosen to ignore.
          We frankly find it curious that more attention and credibility is being accorded purported victims of UFO experiences and spectral visitations, than to persons who complain of systematic harassment and experimentation by the U.S. Government, involving technologies which the U.S. Government is only now grudgingly admitting to possess. These complaints require investigation. In due course (and provided financial support is obtained), we hope to be able to acquire the technology and supportive medical expertise to substantiate the claims being made. We also hope to alter the institutional mindset that U.S. Intelligence can be trusted. History, repeatedly, has proven otherwise. 


    [Reprinted from the June-July 1992 edition of UNCLASSIFIED (Vol. IV, No. 3),
     published by The Association of National Security Alumni, Washington, D.C.]
          The August-September 1991 issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline University’s Public Administration report on the resolution of MKULTRA cases in 1988. Although the shocking details of medical ethics abuses by the U.S. and Canadian governments were amply detailed, Washington and Ottawa—citing national security and government privilege—stalled for so long that the cases never came to trial. The surviving victims settled for a pittance in an out-of-court settlement.
          Since no individuals or agencies were held legally accountable, the door was left open for possible resumption of similar “mind-control” activities.
          In the context of that article, we mentioned briefly that some half-dozen people had contacted us with appeals for assistance in ending what they believe to be electronic harassment and mind-control experimentation, possibly involving the CIA. We decided to take a closer look at this situation.
          We are now in touch with approximately a dozen individuals located throughout the United States who appear to be targets of harassment and mind-control experimentation involving directed-energy technologies. [By mid-November 1992, that number had increased to 25.]
          Typically, persons who complain of being “zapped by radio waves” and of “hearing voices” are stigmatized as psychotic, delusional or schizophrenic. Being mindful of this, as well as aware of the treatment accorded UFO and psychic phenomena “freaks,” we approach this subject with a high degree of caution. Based on our preliminary investigation, including interviews with the affected individuals, we conclude that the matter is serious and should be pursued further.

    The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal

          Our first step was to determine what, if any technology exists which might be used for electronic harassment. That information was found in a “white paper” published in 1991 by the U.S. Global Strategy Council—a Washington-based organization, under the chairmanship of Ray Cline, former Deputy Director of the CIA, who maintains very close ties with the U.S. Intelligence community. The “white paper” describes the foreign and domestic uses foreseen for laser weapons, isotropic radiators, infrasound, non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse generators, and high-power microwave emitters.
          The term, “non-lethal,” used to describe this technology is misleading. The energy emitted from all of these weapons can kill when appropriately amplified. At lower levels of amplification, they can cause extreme forms of physical discomfort and debilitation.
          The Department of Army (DA) identifies these same weapons as “non-conventional.” They were so identified in an exhibit at a DA-sponsored symposium on “The Soldier As A System,” in Crystal City, VA, on June 30, 1992. Beta wave incapacitators were separately mentioned during the symposium as being of particular interest to the U.S. Marine Corps.
          We discussed these “non-conventional” directed-energy weapons with Mr. Vernon Shisler, manager of the exhibit and the Army’s delegate to NATO in matters pertaining to “The Soldier As A System.” Mr. Shisler acknowledged not only that directed-energy weapons are in DoD’s arsenal, but also that the American soldier will remain vulnerable to their effects, should they be employed in the battlefield.
          The U.S. Global Strategy Council recognizes the issue of vulnerability, as well, and urges ongoing research into effective countermeasures.
          Interested readers may want to send for the U.S. Global Strategy Council’s complete project proposal on this subject: (Title:Nonlethality: Development of a National Policy and Employing Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic Era, prepared by Janet Morris). A number of references in this Proposal to unidentified, elusive “enemies” of the U.S. Government and to the potential domestic applications of this “non-lethal” technology invite serious consideration by the public at large.
          The Council’s address is 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, (202) 466-6029.

    Bioeffects of Microwave Radiation

          Research into the biological and psychological effects of exposure to microwave radiation is voluminous. The U.S. public has been led to believe that the former Soviet Union leads in this research. The fact is, the CIA and DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly pursued precisely the same research since commencement of Project Pandora in the 1950’s. The current primary users of this research appear to be the CIA, DoD, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of Energy (DoE).
          The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has participated in this research since Project Pandora. In 1973, WRAIR discovered that externally-induced auditory input could be achieved by means of pulsed microwave audiograms, or analogs of spoken words’ sounds. The effect on the receiving end is the (schizophrenic) sensation of “hearing voices” which are not part of the recipients’ own thought processes.
          The experiment prompted the following comment in The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, by Robert O. Becker, M.D., and Gary Selden (Wm. Morrow & Company, NY, 1985): “Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with ‘voices’ or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin.”
          This research has continued, and the results are published in various publicly available scientific and technical journals. Interested readers might consult, for example: Lin, James C., Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems (Plenum Press, NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then with the Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, has published a number of books and articles on this subject. [He has more recently informed us that he had designed the experiment referenced above in Dr. Becker’s book.]
          WRAIR has more recently been studying the biological effects of exposure to high-power microwave radiation. WRAIR presented a paper on this subject to a DoD-sponsored symposium on “MW [microwave] Weapons” at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, in mid-1989.
          A matter of interest to us is why WRAIR should be experimenting with auditory effects of pulsed microwave audiograms. Also, recent statements by an Army psychiatrist assigned to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) suggest that WRAIR may be experimenting upon select psychiatric inpatients with microwaves. This, too, is a matter of interest to us.

    Congressional Oversight

          The Government’s past record of abuses in the area of civil rights is well documented. Within the past 30 years alone, we have witnessed the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO.
          Primarily because of MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive Orders and implementing regulations were published which prohibited military and CIA domestic covert intelligence operations. Experiments on involuntary human subjects, and the surveillance of/collection of personal information on U.S. citizens, except under strictly regulated conditions were also prohibited.
          Congressional committees were created to oversee compliance with these (quasi‑) legal prohibitions. We have evidence that this is not being done. Moreover, where there are laws and, in this case, no laws enacted, there are loopholes, as well as individual and institutions who deliberately capitalize upon the existence of loopholes. Iran-Contra is one of the more blatant recent examples. Loopholes are also found in government resort to “black” intelligence and weapons programs, in the use of contractors, and in the absence of clear definitions of such terms as “national security” and “national security risk.”
          Executive Orders and regulations which currently limit official U.S. Intelligence activities do not extend to non-intelligence government agencies or to their contractors. In fact, Executive Order 12333 specifies that government contractors do not need to know that their services support U.S. Intelligence objectives.
          In its report of July 8, 1992, the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management addresses the problem of tracking funds granted to government-contracted research and development (R&D) centers. The report notes that the problem is compounded by DoD’s penchant for creating hard-to-monitor “shell” contractors as disbursement centers for funding programs.
          Neither shell contractors nor their subcontractors are directly accountable to Congress. Being beyond Congressional oversight, they have the license to operate as Government surrogates in intelligence operations about which, “officially” they know nothing.
          In this context, a publication disseminated at DA’s “The Soldier As A System” symposium noted that the Army’s Research and Technology Program sponsors 42 laboratories and R&D centers, employing approximately 10,000 scientists and engineers. The annual budget of $1.3 billion is only a small part of overall DoD research spending.
          Weapons research, which includes the development and testing of “non-lethal” weapons, is not governed by laws restricting the activities of U.S. Intelligence agencies, though it may be presumed that these agencies contribute to and benefit from such research.



    Preliminary Findings

    1.      The technology exists for the types of harassment and experimentation reported to us.

    2.      About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of continuing experiences with effects which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce.

    3.      U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bioeffects of exposure to microwave radiation is extensive and continuing.

    4.      The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged in mind-control experimentation; and various agencies of the Government have a record of circumventing legal restrictions upon their activities.

    5.      Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look closely into “black” intelligence and weapons procurement programs.

    6.      A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest in testing directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens under non-clinical/non-controlled circumstances—DoD, to test ranges and degrees of “non-lethality”; DoE, to explore “safety” limits; CIA, to test “mind-control” capabilities, and NSA, for technological refinement.



          Since publication of the preceding article less than four months ago, the association of National Security Alumni/Electronic Surveillance Project has heard from an additional 13* individuals who report both overt harassment and a range of symptoms which coincide with the known effects of exposure to microwaves, electromagnetic/radio frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound.
          The similarity of these symptoms will be addressed in greater detail in future Project reports. Suffice it to say, at this point, that the physical and psychological symptoms being reported to us are consistent with the effects which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce. Indeed, the numerous afflictions (or “inflictions”) being reported appear to parallel standard torture “sequelae,”[1] (aftereffects).

    Overt Harassment

          Overt Harassment—which obviously is meant to be observed—may be intended to “precondition” individuals for eventual long-term electronic harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained overt harassment are not likely to cope with the sudden onset of electronic harassment in any more reasoned fashion. This phased pattern of harassment is apparent in all of the cases now being investigated. The fact that the overt harassment continues in these cases even after the electronic targeting commences suggests that the objective is to maintain long-term extremes of stress.
          Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are surfacing in cases which (so far) have not involved discernible forms of electronic harassment. These are cases involving so-called “whistleblowers” who, because of their inside knowledge of certain potentially newsworthy events, pose particular threats of embarrassment to the Government or to government-affiliated employers. We have noticed that electronic harassment is beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who try to assist electronic “harassees.” Retaliation suggests loss of control. Under the circumstances, we are not entirely confident that “whistleblowers” will continue to be exempted from this type of harassment in the long term.
          The individuals now in touch with the Project describe their circumstances as involving most, if not all, of the following overt forms of harassment:
    ·        Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of harassment and vandalism by formerly friendly neighbors.
    ·        Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the targeted individual obtains new, unlisted telephone numbers.
    ·        Mail interception, theft and tampering.
    ·        Noise campaigns.
          While unrelenting harassing telephone calls might be considered in this context, other tactics are employed. Blaring horns, whistles, sirens, garbage disposal (run concurrently in apartment settings, for excessively prolonged periods of time), and amplified transmissions of recorded “general racket” have been used on a recurrent basis under circumstances intended to persuade the individual that he or she is under surveillance.
          In all of these cases, the individuals’ neighbors apparently pretend to be oblivious and/or indifferent to these sudden, continuous explosions of noise.
          Door slamming is also a popular pastime, particularly in apartment buildings. One individual reported that, during a peak period of harassment, the neighbor across the hall began entering and leaving his apartment every 10 minutes, slamming his door loudly on each occasion. This was a daily occurrence, encompassing periods of several hours, over a period of several months. It apparently served to trigger a door-slamming “chain reaction” on the part of neighbors both on that floor and on the floors immediately above and below. When our contact politely asked her immediate neighbor to close his door more quietly, he slammed the door in her face. Prior to commencement of this harassment, that neighbor had apparently been quite friendly and courteous.
          In another case, the primary door-slammer is an employee of Radix Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoD contractor engaged in the “super-secret” research and development of some type of electronic equipment.
          Several individuals reported recurrent, loud, strange noises in their ventilation systems during the preliminary stages of their harassment. One individual complained of being recurrently awakened in the middle of the night by the sound of wires being fed into his (independent) ventilation system. On checking further, he found that a tubular construction had been built into his vent system which appears to lead to the apartment upstairs. His upstairs neighbor is employed by the Department of Justice.
          A number of individuals report that occupants of upstairs and downstairs apartments appear to follow them from room to room, tapping on the floor or engaging in other activities which appear intended to advertise an ongoing surveillance.
          The Justice Department employee mentioned above went so far as to offer an unsolicited apology to her downstairs neighbor for the all-night “pacing about” in her bedroom (in the event he had happened to notice it). She claimed to be an insomniac. That pacing-about continued during her recent 36-hour absence from the area. When our contact politely alerted her to the fact that her apartment had apparently been entered during her absence, she told him, in effect, to mind his own business and then immediately complained to the building manager that he was stalking her.
          She conveniently forgot to inform the building manager that she had assiduously “courted” this individual for several months, without success; and that she had been stealing his newspapers on a regular basis. (On one occasion, she handed him a week’s accumulation of those papers, claiming that they had been left outside the door of another apartment. Her reason for collecting and saving newspapers which had not been delivered to her directly is unknown.)
    ·        Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers; and comments by strangers which appear intended to evoke “paranoid” reactions.
          In this context, we note that several individuals have reported confrontations with “homeless” people who, on closer examination, were found to be fastidiously clean, though garbed in offbeat fashion (wigs included). The same “eccentric” confronted two of the individuals in contact with us, at separate distant locations. He is reported as having feigned mental illness on both occasions, and as having apparently enjoyed creating a public scene.
    ·        Entries into the individual’s residence, during late-night hours while he/she is sleeping, and/or during the day when the individual is elsewhere.
          In virtually all such cases, the burglars leave evidence of their visits, such as by relocating objects, or by committing petty and not-so-petty acts of vandalism. In two cases, the burglar’s “calling card” was to slaughter caged pets, leaving the mangled carcasses inside their locked cages.
          In one case, the burglar stole several pieces of correspondence and left a packet of crack cocaine behind as a “calling card.” Our contact in this case—an individual who has no criminal record and no history of experimentation with drugs—is also being harassed (stalked) by a police officer in her community. One of his recent acts was to “frame” her with a drug possession charge. After pulling her off the road (a frequent pastime) and subjecting her to an illegal search (done, twice, so far), he conveniently managed to find a glassine packet of cocaine eight feet away, in front of his squad car. He retrieved the packet with his fingers and then charged her with Possession. Our contact found the packet of crack cocaine in her apartment shortly after this investigator reminded the attorney handling her case that the police officer had smudged his only piece of evidence with his own fingerprints. It would appear that someone is interested in correcting that police officer’s oversight.
          In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount of money had been stolen from a hiding place in her apartment, within hours after she had withdrawn the money from her bank. There were no obvious signs of entry into her apartment. The police conducted a cursory inquiry which failed to produce evidence of a crime worthy of investigation. (This case is an anomaly. Money is not usually stolen. Documents appear to be the preferred objects of theft, when thefts occur.)
          In another case, the burglars replaced installed lightbulbs with “exploding” bulbs, many of which were Made in Hungary. The lightbulbs are now in our possession.
    ·        Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive nature.
          In two cases of the cases reported, massive rectal bleeding accompanied the sudden onset of severe gastrointestinal disturbances. One of these individuals abruptly terminated the deteriorative process simply by changing the locks on her door.
    ·        Sleep disruption/deprivation.
          This is achieved by means of both overt and electronic harassment. Sleep deprivation, as a tactic, invariably surfaces when the targeted individual begins exhibiting a strong emotional and irrational response to the other forms of harassment.
    ·        Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles.
          Vehicles invite peculiarly ferocious attacks in these harassment campaigns—slashed tires, smashed windows, oil drainage, oil contamination, destruction of electronic components and batteries (frequently involving wildly fluctuating, grounded fuel gages, often within range of weapons research facilities and/or other microwave emitters); and suddenly failed brakes and clutches (possibly involving anti-traction polymers, which are also in DoD’s “non-lethal” weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto thefts have also been reported.
          Two individuals reported finding their oil contaminated immediately after having the oil changed by reputable mechanics. In one of these cases, the oil viscosified (thickened) while the individual was driving through a remote rural area. Her car ground to a halt. Getting the “gunk” cleaned out of her engine proved to be an expensive ordeal. (Viscosification agents are also lauded by the U.S. Global Strategy Council as serving “non-lethal” strategic purposes—a topic discussed in Part I of this publication. Had this woman been assaulted while awaiting help in the said isolated area, the “non-lethal” attributes of viscosification agents might have required redefinition.)
          Most of those who have experienced these attacks on a recurring basis have abandoned driving all together—an objective apparently sought by their tormentors as a means of increasing their isolation.
    ·        Staged accidents.
          The majority of those in touch with us have reported these types of experiences. One individual, for example, was tailgated at a high rate of speed by two vehicles, while concurrently being threatened with a gun by one of the vehicles’ occupants. Two others narrowly avoided what appeared to be deliberately attempted collisions by drivers who quickly sped away from the scene. One avoided three attempts in four days at being run off the road. One survived being run off the road in two incidents within a one-week period, which resulted in “totaling” of her two vehicles. Another narrowly avoided being crushed into an expressway retaining wall, on four occasions, by an off-duty metro bus, as well as, within the same time frame, being “fried” by two suddenly-malfunctioned household appliances which subsequently repaired themselves.
          It should be noted that, in some of these cases, “accidental” deaths do occur. One individual in contact with us reported that his mother drove off a cliff to her death, during a period when he was researching evidence that a still-respected, high level State Department official had passed A-bomb secrets to the Soviet Government during World War II. The accident occurred shortly after her car had undergone routine maintenance. She was returning from a dental appointment when the accident occurred. Witnesses state that it appeared that she had suddenly stepped on the accelerator before running off the road. The accident served to terminate this person’s research project.
          We are also currently looking into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO, who was killed when the brakes on her tractor failed. We are informed that she had been collecting affidavits from persons who believe they are the targets of government harassment and experimentation when her “accident” occurred. We are also informed that those affidavits have disappeared.
          Suicides might also qualify as “staged accidents,” particularly where “plausibly deniable” government involvement has been surfaced. We are currently looking into the recent suicide of a man in Trappe, PA, who, as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and CIA to intervene in his case. We have copies of that early correspondence. The man, a former U.S. Army radar technician, had a highly technical and—given the date of his correspondence—“precocious” grasp of the experimental objectives apparently being sought in his case. It is apparent from his correspondence that he had wanted to believe that the Soviets were conducting these experiments. The FBI and CIA, of course, did not intervene. We are informed that members of his family have also been targets of this experimentation.
    ·        Isolation of the individual from members of his/her immediate family—virtually assured when highly focused forms of electronic harassment commence.
          The exception to this is when elderly parents and young children in the family become targets for apparent purposes of intimidation. This situation has been reported in eight of our cases, to date.
          One individual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing electronic harassment focusing on her children) killed one child in an effort to protect her from further pain.[2] It appears that lasers were being used in this individual’s case. The targeting intensified after she called the Soviet Embassy to report the harassment, which she believed to be U.S. Government-sponsored. It became even more deadly when, in a further show of defiance, she then called the representative of the Iraqi Government to portray the U.S. Government’s war in the Middle East as “hypocritical.” She is now hospitalized in a midwestern psychiatric facility, where, apparently, the experimentation is now continuing.
          (That psychiatric facility is in a State where a disproportionate number of complaints of electronic harassment are beginning to surface. It is also within range of a U.S. Air Force base which houses a “super secret” research facility. We are currently looking into information that spouses and children of persons employed on that USAF base may be the targets of involuntary experimentation involving directed-energy weapons technologies.)
          Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by an employee of a local power company that, if she valued the lives of her children, she would drop her public opposition to the company’s installation of high power lines. Since receiving that threat, the individual’s 11-year-old daughter has been reduced to extremes of pain, resulting in her recurrent hospitalization for treatment of illnesses which cannot be diagnosed. It is now also apparent to this individual that her three-year-old son is on the receiving end of externally-induced auditory input. (DoE figures prominently in this case.)
    ·        Progressive financial impoverishment, brought on by termination of the individual’s employment, and compounded by expenses associated with the harassment.
          The majority of those now in contact with the Project—educated, white-collar professionals—have lost their jobs. Termination of employment in many of these cases involved prefatory harassment by the employer and co-workers, which coincided with the other overt forms of harassment discussed above.
          The overt harassment tactics are being described as recurrent, non-sequential and overlapping. As noted above, the overt harassment continues even after the electronic harassment commences.

    Failure of “Establishment” Support Systems

          Those individuals who have tried to resolve their respective situations through resort to “establishment” channels have invariably encountered the following:
    ·        Apathy, indifference and/or professed helplessness on the part of members of Congress and state legislators.
    ·        Dismissal and/or attempted discrediting by psychiatrists who refuse to include the terms, “government harassment,” “mind-control experimentation” and “torture” in their vocabulary.
          Several individuals, thinking that psychiatrists might help to alleviate the extreme stress associated with their harassment, were accorded “treatment” which clearly pointed to cooperation between their psychiatrists and members of the U.S. Intelligence community. One such psychiatrist, in fact, bragged about being a member of the U.S. Intelligence “inner circle,” informing our contact that her harassment was a “Pavlovian Experiment,” intended to “break” her.
    ·        Lack of interest, courage and/or competency in legal circles.
          Few of those in contact with us have been able to acquire legal assistance—not helped by their straitened financial circumstances. Most have found that few attorneys are willing to risk their careers by pursuing cases involving what is believed to be government-sponsored harassment and experimentation.
          A few attorneys reportedly engaged in egregious violations of codes of professional conduct, in what appear to have been deliberate efforts at sabotaging our contacts’ cases. Subsequent attempts by two individuals at obtaining legal redress were met with stonewalling, obstruction, and high-level denials of wrongdoing.
    ·        Refusal of the mass media to address this topic, except in those cases where suspected experimentees have been driven to the point of committing murder or suicide.
          Such cases (particularly where an individual has claimed to be the victim of CIA-directed mind-control involving auditory input) are treated by the press as “curiosities.” An example of this is the individual who shot a Navy officer outside the Pentagon in mid-1991.[3] He claimed to be a victim of CIA mind control, involving auditory input. According to the press, “he worried ‘about being run over by trains’...” (ref. incident described in following paragraph). He is now permanently residing in a psychiatric facility. He, being institutionalized, and others in the preliminary stages of his predicament are no longer of interest to the media.
          Another recent case which received short-lived press attention[4] involved a woman diagnosed as having “suffered from periods of confusion” who climbed over a fence onto a railroad track and walked into an oncoming train. Because the incident occurred in a community in which an unusually large number of these mind-control experiments have been reported, we are looking into the situation. The woman was reportedly “under a physician’s care” because of her “periods of confusion.” A family member described the physician to this investigator as “a psychiatrist.” We find that the alleged “psychiatrist” is a General Practitioner, otherwise non-accredited, practicing out of his home. We find also that the suicide may have been witnessed under peculiarly-timed circumstances by an alleged “homeless” person who has since disappeared. Needless to say, our interest has been whetted.
    ·        Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene.
          The tendency of local police is to dismiss an individual’s complaints of government harassment as the ravings of a “fruitcake.” In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that one police officer is actively cooperating in the harassment. Some police agencies, while acknowledging the reality of the situation, hesitate to intervene in cases involving what they believe to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions, certain police officials did attempt to intervene, based on what they perceived to be evidence of a systematic harassment/illegal surveillance campaign. Absent a clear mandate to prosecute “stalkers” acting under the aegis of U.S. Intelligence, the police obviously had their hands tied.
    ·        Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases brought to our attention thus far.
          FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large number of requests for assistance from “mentally disturbed persons” who believe that they are being “zapped by radio waves” and/or “are hearing voices...” “from Mars, that is.”
          In one case, an FBI spokesman reacted in an angry, defensive and bizarre fashion when our contact briefly alluded to PROJECT SLAMMER as possibly being related to her surveillance. (PROJECT SLAMMER is a CIA-funded study, managed by CIA and FBI behavioral scientist, which explores the “mental make-up” of alleged security risks, along with their family members and close associates. Participants in PROJECT SLAMMER include NSA, DIA, and Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.)
          Until PROJECT SLAMMER was mentioned, the FBI spokesman’s approach in this case was to politely and redundantly explain that the law, as currently constructed, prevents the FBI’s intervening in this individual’s case. When she briefly pointed out that the surveillance activities might fall under the purview of PROJECT SLAMMER, the spokesman’s response was to abruptly and angrily declaim, “You don’t know who is conducting that surveillance! You don’t know if that is a state police surveillance! ...or a local police surveillance! It could be a totally unrelated operation! You don’t know who is conducting that surveillance! [etc., etc.]!”
          It was apparent from this response that the FBI was at least acknowledging the existence of a surveillance, if in somewhat emotional fashion. The individual in question subsequently furnished acquired evidence to the local police, who made it clear that they are not participants in the surveillance which, based on the evidence, pointedly suggest that our contact is the target.
    ·        Refusal or inability of the ACLU and Amnesty International to intervene.
          Both organizations acknowledge receiving many complaints from persons claiming to be the targets of some type of electronic harassment. An ACLU spokes-woman characterized the complaints as appearing to be rational, except in a few cases. The complaints are not being investigated, she said, because of “limited resources.” We have to wonder, of course, why the ACLU could recently find resources to defend the rights of prostitutes and the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases such as we are now pursuing.
          Amnesty International recently informed one of our contacts that they could not intervene in her case because their focus is on the U.S. Government’s treatment of prison inmates. While incarceration does appear to be one sought-for objective in these harassment/mind control experiments, we would like to think that protections by such organizations as Amnesty International can be achieved beforehand.

    Related Covert Methodologies

          The persons engaged in this harassment tend to become careless, possibly the result of arrogance born of an assumption that nobody can stop them. “Harassees” who have noted this carelessness have furnished us with the following insights into the covert side of these harassment activities.
    ·        Impersonation of military officers.
          One individual found that her next-door neighbor had claimed to be a military intelligence officer, assigned to a space technology unit in California, on year-long “TDY” (temporary duty) in the individual’s apartment building. It was subsequently determined that this alleged officer is not in fact a member of the U.S. Armed Forces; and that he had used this bogus status to acquire information from a major defense contractor. Our contact is certain that this person’s apartment was used as a base of harassment operations.
    ·        Use of concealment devices, and emitters detected to date.
          Several individuals and supportive associates report having seen some of the electronic devices being used in these harassment campaigns.
          One saw electronic equipment concealed inside a false-front upright piano being moved out of her apartment building. She had previously noted that all of her surrounding neighbors had identical upright pianos in their apartments, not one of which was ever played.
          Other suspected participants in the harassment may be concealing devices in oversized stereo speakers, measuring approximately 5' in height x 3' x 3'. Several of our contacts have noted the presence of such speakers in adjacent dwellings.
          One individual was told by a resident of her building that her upstairs neighbor has “microwave ovens” in his bedroom and livingroom, but none in the kitchen.
          Another individual, while standing outside, looked into her neighbor’s window to find that her bedroom appeared to be the target of a gray-colored, elongated box-like device, measuring approximately 1' in length x 5" in height (side view). A large, black-framed lens protruded from the end facing her window. The electrical cord, if any, was not visible from that vantage point. The equipment was being operated by a stranger in a three-piece suit, who appeared to be quite startled to find that he was being observed.
          Another was given strong reason to believe that portable emitters are being concealed in oversized, extremely heavy, sometimes expandable “briefcases” for use in places of public assembly, such as meeting halls, auditoriums and restaurants. Smaller varieties are apparently being used on aircraft.
          On one 3-hour flight, our contact noticed that the man sitting next to her seemed peculiarly intent on keeping the attaché case on his lap propped open with his fingertips, while he gazed “blankly” into the distance during the entire flight. She believed that she was being electronically harassed while on the flight (a common complaint, in most of the cases now being investigated).
          Our contact reports that, when they prepared to land, the man opened his attaché case to hastily check its contents, thus disclosing the presence of a raised, built-in “concealment device” covering the entire bottom surface of the attaché case. The low-slung, lift-off cover did not appear to be capable of concealing a laptop computer. At one point during the flight —apparently aware that his “reverie” was inviting attention, —the man devoted approximately ten minutes to scribbling assorted entries on a sheet of lined paper, which he had placed on top of his briefcase two hours previously. He devoted roughly ten minutes to the effort (obviously preferring a pen to a laptop computer). His attaché case remained ajar during this process.[5]
          One individual reports that mobile emitters may be installed in certain oversized, non-attributable medical emergency vehicles, possibly for eventual use in civil disturbances. Her unsuccessful attempts at following the “medical emergency” vehicle which had surfaced in her case ended with a high-speed chase.
          The phony military intelligence officer, when recently moving out of our contact’s apartment building, was found to possess a device which resembles an oversized microwave oven, measuring approximately 4' in width x 2' in height x 2 1/2' in depth. A subsequent examination of his apartment revealed that he had tapped numerous additional lines into existing, in-house telephone and TV cables; and that he had gone to great pains to conceal a major excavation into one wall abutting the “harassee’s.” Judging from photographs taken immediately after this person’s departure, the wiring suggests that he was hooked by modem into a computer network, and that at least some of his electronic equipment was situated in a large walk-in closet, again abutting the “harassee’s.”
          When the alleged officer moved out, his equipment (except for the oversized “microwave oven”) was packaged in boxes identifying the contents only as stereo components. During his year-long residency in this building, no sounds emanated from his apartment to indicate use of this “stereo” equipment.
    ·        Use of modified license plates and vehicle look-alikes.
          Some individuals have noted that their neighbors’ vehicles are periodically replaced (during peak periods of harassment) by others which qualify as “rough look-alikes.” The tags on these latter closely resemble those on the homeowners’ vehicles, with a difference being noted in only one digit or one letter. These modified plates appear to have been acquired through State DMV channels, thus suggesting government/intelligence agency involvement.
          In one case, where the individual has obtained police assistance, tracking of one plate surfaced evidence of a drug connection. That plate rapidly disappeared from the vehicle in question, to be replaced by another, again bearing a one-letter modification.
    ·        Use of neighbors’ residences as bases of operation and training.
          One individual recently saw a team of “technicians” in the house behind hers—a consequence of the team’s failure to close the curtains and/or dim lighting when puttering around in the kitchen at 5:00 in the morning. The three men (strangers to this individual, all stripped down to their T-shirts) behaved as if they were unaware that they were being watched. Their observer had long suspected that this house was being used as a base of electronic harassment operations. The harassment had been ongoing throughout the night.
          To provoke a response from these men, the individual eventually commented aloud on their activities. They responded immediately by turning the lights off and switching to the use of flashlights. Why they failed to close the curtains is unknown.
          This individual is working with the police in an effort at ending this surveillance and harassment, with mixed results.
    * * *
          Another individual, paying a surprise visit to the apartment upstairs, overheard one of her own telephone conversations being played on a tape recorder inside that apartment. Lacking both a legitimate pretext to enter the apartment and the support of the building’s management personnel and/or the police, she was prevented from pursuing this further. Her upstairs neighbor is purportedly employed by Stanford University Hospital, in Stanford, CA.
          The target of surveillance and harassment in this case is still also trying to recover from the effects of exposure to potentially lethal doses of radiation, administered in the 1970’s by a dangerously “incompetent” dentist. This might explain the involvement of alleged Stanford University Hospital personnel in her situation.
          The government is on record as having experimented on unwitting U.S. citizens with radioactive materials during the 1970’s (and earlier).[6] The House Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce based their investigation into this matter on a 30-year accumulation of documents maintained by the Department of Energy. Under the circumstances, it will come as no surprise if it is ultimately found that DoE has been involved in this woman’s surveillance and harassment.
    * * *
          Another individual paid a surprise visit to the apartment immediately beneath hers, in an attempt to identify the source of a tremendous racket in her ventilation system. Standing outside the door, she could hear an individual moving around, a short distance from the door. She also heard the sound of rustling paper and the steady, sonar-like “pinging” of some type of electronic device. In response to her repeated knockings on the door, the person inside simply stopped moving about. The sound of rustling paper (perhaps a printout of some type) and the steady “!!” sound continued. The occupant of this apartment resumed moving about only after it was (incorrectly) believed that our contact had departed the area. Typically, this situation could not be pursued further.
    * * *
          All of those who live in apartment buildings report unusual patterns of occupancy in the apartments surrounding their own; i.e., upstairs, downstairs and on all sides. They have become quite convinced—if only because of the highly focused nature of the symptoms being experienced—that these surrounding apartments are being used as bases of operation. Perhaps this encirclement facilitates studies of holographic human telemetries; or perhaps it is intended to increase the prospect of brain entrainment by electronic means (“entrainment” being one published objective sought in mind control experiments).[7]
          In examining this situation more closely, a number of individuals have found that surrounding apartments are either permanently vacant, for unknown reasons, or that they have been “sub-let” by the original occupants to persons who are purportedly unknown to the buildings’ management personnel. In one case, the surrounding renters all list two residences in the local telephone book. Not one lives in the apartment building in question, though the address is identified as one of the renters’ places of residence. One individual suspects that the original occupants of apartments surrounding hers have simply been relocated to other apartments in the same (large) building. Another suspects that an adjacent apartment, which has been permanently rented to the U.S. Government for use by “visitors” is also being used as a base of operations.
          One individual found that an immediate neighbor’s housemate has the same (unusual) name of a university professor who has engaged in extensive research on behalf of the government, studying the bioeffects of exposure to microwave radiation.
    ·        Use of informants/agents provocateurs, frequently members of the opposite sex.
          As noted in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Interior and Insular Affair’s draft report, Alyeska Pipeline Service Company Covert Operation (July 1992), the Wackenhut Corporation’s Special Investigations Division adopted this tactic when pursuing Alyeska’s critics.
          A number of individuals in touch with us report a range of experiences with new “friends” who—apparently posing as confidants—used acquired personalia to abruptly end these “friendships” under deliberately degrading and humiliating circumstances. When taken in the context of the ongoing surveillances and harassment, these exercises appear intended to heighten emotional trauma, perhaps to provoke an uncontrolled response and/or to enforce isolation.
    ·        Misuse of covert intelligence personnel (possible former case officers).
          One individual, while under contract to the U.S. Government, properly reported what he believed to be an approach by a hostile intelligence service. Within a few weeks, alleged U.S. Intelligence officers contacted this individual. In addition to questioning him about his background, these alleged intelligence officers asked that he keep in constant touch with them, particularly when planning to travel.
          It soon became apparent that the alleged intelligence officers were intent only on forcing this individual to report to them as directed, and to account for his activities. He was not asked to assist the U.S. Government in any form of intelligence operation; he was not asked to execute any form of secrecy affirmation statement acknowledging the classified nature of these meetings; nor was he told why these meetings—involving a total of seven alleged case officers—were necessary.
          When he began to balk at a continuation of this process, one of his “handlers” conveyed a threat, suggesting that his continued compliance might be “enforced.” Finally, when this individual adamantly refused to cooperate further, massive overt harassment commenced and is currently ongoing.
          The operation (clearly intended to bully this individual into submissive compliance for purposes which are still unknown) involved crude tactics formerly prized by the KGB.
          Whether or not legitimate U.S. Intelligence case officers were involved in this activity remains to be determined. Some private firms retain former U.S. Intelligence case officers for contracting out as “security specialist.” The founder and CEO of one such firm (Gerald P. Burke, The Parvus Company, Silver Spring, MD) has informed us that the activities of contract case officers are neither monitored nor subject to formal restraint.
    ·        Use of psychotropic drugs by cooperative physicians.
          Shortly after resigning from the CIA, one of our contacts underwent a range of experiences which suggested that she had been massively drugged. One of the alleged perpetrators, whom we have met, alternately claims to be employed by NASA and/or by a firm in Miami, handling, “microwave equipment.” NASA has no record of this person under the name furnished.
          The “experimentee” ultimately sought the assistance of a psychiatrist, whom her parents had located as a referral. The psychiatrist treated her reported “flashbacks” by immediately placing her on a regimen of Stelazine, which quickly aggravated her condition. He also made comments to this individual which suggested that he had a foreknowledge of her situation, and that he was cooperating with U.S. Intelligence. On one occasion the psychiatrist intimated that our contact might be employable as an assassin; and he repeatedly urged her to move to Great Britain where, he said, she would be put in touch with an unidentified Member of Parliament.
          Interestingly, he had a tremendous computer system in his office suite, which he explained as being connected by modem into a national level system which, in turn, connected into private residences. When showing her this equipment, this psychiatrist informed our contact that she had been “CAT scanned,” pointing out that she was the subject of the vast series of “A’s” and “B’s” being printed out by one of the many terminals at his disposal.
          Our contact also found that this psychiatrist kept a military uniform in his closet which bore the rank and insignia of a three-star general.
          The individual ultimately sought psychiatric support elsewhere. Her new psychiatrist, formerly employed by DoD, immediately put her on a regimen of Haldol Decanoate, Klonopin and Benzatropine. The combined effect of these drugs was loss of memory and a state of mind which, under other circumstances, might be diagnosed as Depersonalization or Dissociative Disorder. All three drugs proved to be highly addictive. Our contact, since severing contact with this psychiatrist as well, has finally successfully overcome the addiction.
    * * *
          Another individual—the one whose psychiatrist had informed her of her role in a “Pavlovian Experiment”—was subjected to attempted drugging by Trazodone, one of the strongest sedatives on the market. The psychiatrist in question kept no record of the individual’s outpatient visits, nor of her Trazodone prescriptions. Being unaware that the individual was not adhering to his regimen, the psychiatrist urged her to rapidly increase her dosage, renewing her 30-day prescription after a period of only 11 days.
          Though aware of her heart condition, he failed to monitor her condition, dismissing her complaints of (electronically-induced) pains in her heart as inconsequential. Trazodone is known to aggravate heart conditions. Perhaps the intent was to have this individual succumb to a “heart attack” as the result of “imagined” government harassment. Neither the appropriate psychiatric society nor the FBI would touch this case.
    * * *
          Another individual (a clear target of retaliation) sought medical assistance to counter sudden massive headaches and recurrent attacks of vomiting—effects which can be produced by infrasound. The physician to whom she was referred (an alleged specialist in Internal Medicine) placed her on a combination of Compazine and Xanax, prescribing dosages which the Physicians’ Desk Reference warns against.
          Compazine, in addition to being an anti-emetic, is used in the treatment of psychotic disorders. It can also cause tardive dyskinesia, an irreversible syndrome involving loss of motor control. Xanax is known to induce vomiting. Both drugs can lead to dependency and a worsening of the patient’s condition. The effects of all such drugs, in fact, can be mutated in high-energy fields, thus increasing the likelihood of adverse reactions.
          We have recently found that this prescribing “physician” is not licensed to practice medicine in the State in which she has been practicing since at least 1989.
          Our contact, being concerned about the long-term effects of Xanax and Compazine, consulted another physician in that same office. This physician immediately prescribed Prozac, failing to concurrently recommend that her patient discontinue the Xanax and Compazine prescriptions. When our contact refused to take any psychotropic drugs, the doctor became upset and asked, “Don’t you want to get well?”
          This second physician is a licensed practitioner in Internal Medicine, with no background in Psychiatry. We have also found that she apparently refers her patients to yet a third physician in the office who claims to be a psychiatrist. She, too, is licensed to practice Internal Medicine, only. Her receptionist described this third physician as having a psychiatric “sub-specialty,” ... “as an internist.” The receptionist also informed us that this internist “is treating a number of psychiatric patients.”
          On pursuing this further, we find that these physicians are in a small “medical group” which is not listed by specialty in standard regional telephone directories. The group bears the same name as one of the CIA’s most infamous recruited physicians (perhaps best described as “the Mengele of MKULTRA”).
          The doctor’s offices are located in a bank building, which, we have found, is a favored hiding place for security-oriented businesses and government agencies. Two computer firms, co-located with an attorney who represents “Island Resort Development, Ltd.,” are situated immediately beneath the doctors’ offices. The prospect of our finding island resort developments within 500 miles of this attorney’s office is limited.
          Our contact, being apprised of these findings, is seeking medical help elsewhere.
    * * *
          In two of our cases, urologists took it upon themselves to play the role of “psychiatrist”; i.e., they rendered psychiatric diagnoses and prescribed psychotropic drugs. One of these urologists, employed by The Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, prescribed Haldol, informing our contact that he perceived her to be “psychotic.” His efforts at getting a Clinic psychiatrist to confirm this diagnosis were unsuccessful. The psychiatrist, apparently a rare individual who subscribes to codes of medical ethics, found nothing wrong with this woman, even given the nature of her complaints. The urologist’s response to this was to issue his own Haldol prescription. Sensing that something was amiss, the woman refused to have the prescription filled.
    * * *
          Yet another individual ended up in the hands of a psychiatrist who, as a purported means of ending the stress associated with her harassment, offered to put her under hypnosis. She described the hypnotic state as “equivalent to floating” and (based on her overall experiences with this physician) has not ruled out the possibility that drugs may have been surreptitiously administered. The psychiatrist claimed to be interested in psychic phenomena and demonstrated an apparently remarkable ability to read this individual’s mind.
          While in her “hypnotic state, the individual felt a sharp, painful pressure inside her nose, as if something were being shoved up her nostrils to the sinus cavities. She awoke to find blood pouring out of her nostrils. The psychiatrist casually dismissed this as owing to a probable cold.
          Shortly after that experience, the individual began to hear loud tones in her head, followed in due coarse by auditory input. Brain scans have failed to yield evidence of an implanted device. (We have recommended that she undergo a scan by means of a suitably adapted non-linear junction detector, as a preliminary.) Suffice it to say, this individual has severed contact with the psychiatrist and is continuing to cope with ongoing overt and electronic harassment by other non-medical means.
    ·        Use of medical implant devices.
          The situation just described is not our first encounter with the apparent use of medical implant devices in these harassment/mind-control cases. Another of our contacts began receiving auditory input roughly 15 years after she had 4 mm. cochlear implants placed in her ears. The “voices” claimed to be affiliated with the CIA and, among other things, expressed intentions of running this woman as an agent in denied areas by “piggybacking” their audio transmissions onto standard FM frequencies to avoid detection.
          We have been unable to locate the surgeon who implanted these devices, though we do have a copy of his operative reports. A recent CAT scan of this individual failed to disclose the presence of the cochlear implants.
          Several years ago, the individual (now a psychologist) applied for a position with the CIA. She was interviewed by four Langley-based, purported psychologist, who allegedly informed her that her job would involve the assessment of certain criminals for purposes of weighing their prospects for loyalty to this agency.
          During these interviews, she was told to read several books by such persons as Philip Agee, Stansfield Turner and Ralph McGehee, all of whom were unknown to her. The alleged psychologist claimed that these authors had described the CIA “as it really is.” Our contact was not asked to execute a secrecy affirmation statement acknowledging the classified nature of these proceedings.
          The unconventional manner of this interview process suggests that this individual was being toyed with, for reasons which remain to be determined. She did not get the job and in fact more recently lost her job with a state penitentiary. She was fired on the recommendation of the prison’s psychiatrist, because of her insistence that she is receiving auditory input from CIA personnel who persist in feeding her classified information.
          Interestingly, though this individual was deemed unfit to function as a psychologist in the penitentiary system, the State has rehired her, assigning her to a mental health facility where, apparently, she is to develop a behavioral modification program for retarded adults with diagnosed mental illnesses.
          This individual claimed to be receiving and responding to externally-induced auditory “advice” while working with prison inmates. It may be presumed that the process will continue. Under the circumstances, we have to wonder if this case qualifies as a benchmark in mind-control experimentation; i.e., employment of a mind-controlled psychologist to run the equivalent of mind-control experiments on mentally-ill retarded adults. We will continue to monitor the situation.
    * * *
          The individual whom we previously identified as having challenged a local power company also appears to have been “tagged” by some type of implant device. During a recent symposium, she was approached by a man whose business card identifies him as “Program Manager, Electromagnetic Radiation Division,” DoE. His approach was suitably sympathetic. Our contact ultimately accepted the man’s invitation to continue discussing their common ranges of interest in his hotel room. During this meeting, she accepted the offer of a drink, blacked out after consuming it, and awoke four hours later, still in this man’s hotel room, to find that the back of her ear had been punctured and was bleeding. There was no evidence of a sexual assault. The man glibly evaded this woman’s requests for an explanation. She has since found two adjacent puncture marks behind her ear, which are not healing properly, and between which she can feel the presence of a “wire” measuring approximately 1/4" in length. We are pursuing this further.
          The said DoE Project Manager has more recently initiated contact with yet another activist in touch with this Association. His call was unsolicited. He apparently wanted to know if this woman would be attending an upcoming conference. We have warned the individual to avoid any form of private meeting with the said Project Manager.
    * * *
          To date, we are aware of three cases involving clandestine behavior on the part of alleged DoE employees. The CIA figures prominently (if peculiarly) in the majority of our other cases. Two of those have been discussed above.
          In another, also involving auditory input, the individual is certain that the current Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) participated in the “voice transmission” process on at least one occasion. She claims to have recognized his voice. When she commented aloud on the DCI’s perceived involvement in this experimentation, the “voice” responded with stuttered and stammered denials. We are told that this particular “voice” has not been heard from since.
    * * *
          In yet another case involving auditory input, the individual has allegedly been informed by her “voices” that the technologies being used against her were stolen from the CIA by a maverick employee, whose group is now targeting her from a distance of 2,000 miles. She reported this to the DCI’s office and was allegedly informed by the Deputy DCI that she will be awarded millions of dollars if she can produce the equipment and any of the personnel involved in her harassment.
          One unusually-candid CIA spokesman also allegedly informed this individual that, “while the CIA does not deny having this equipment,” they “do not use it in this country.” Perhaps this explains why a number of our contacts have also been electronically harassed while traveling overseas.
          This woman has also been repeatedly assured by CIA DDS (security) personnel of the Agency’s sincere concern for her welfare. During a recent telephone conversation with that Office, we confirmed that she is indeed known to the CIA. Based on this, we asked that the Agency “put its money where its mouth is,” so to speak, by conducting a long-term electronic sweep of this individual’s premises. That was two months ago. No sweep has been conducted, though CIA spokesmen continue to “sympathize” with her predicament.
    * * *
          Another individual, a target of harassment and experimentation since 1952 (apparently singled out because of his student activism while at Penn State University) began hearing “voices” after having most of his teeth capped. He has more recently been informed by his “handlers” that implanted devices are no longer used for purposes of inducing auditory input. No explanation was offered. He was quite visibly surprised when informed by this investigator that auditory input can be achieved solely by means of pulsed microwave audiograms (discussed in Part I of this report).
          This individual’s “handlers” allegedly have also stated that their experiments on U.S. citizens are in pursuit of a variety of objectives; viz.,
          (1) develop an effective means for creating a perfect, “robotized” soldier;
          (2) alter individual sexual preferences, such as by turning heterosexuals into homosexuals (they allegedly claim to be having “difficulties” reversing the process): and
          (3) enhance or destroy levels of academic achievement, at will, such as by degrading the performance of otherwise brilliant students, and by drastically improving the performance of poor students.
          Given the technology at the government’s disposal and a predisposition on the part of certain governmental agencies to “play God” in experimental fashion with citizens’ lives, these purported projects do not come across as being totally far-fetched.
    * * *
          Another case involves a woman whose experiences suggest that she, too, is an MKULTRA experimentee being kept on the books, so to speak. The woman, apparently a “pet” experimentee, found herself being introduced to a wide array of prominent individuals whose connections with the CIA she believed to be quite apparent. One of those she states, was Robert Jay Lifton, a well-known author and expert on brainwashing, whose books include The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide (Basic Books, 1986).
          Her experiences included a voluntary (“referral”) admission to Hollywood Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in 1973, during an era when MKULTRA experiments at the Alan Memorial Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, were only beginning to capture the attention of the U.S. Senate.[8]
          More recently, in 1990, she was transported to New York University’s Cameron Medical Center, in Westchester, NY (under circumstances which qualify as an abduction), where she was forcibly wrestled to the ground by approximately six Center staffers and forcibly confined for a period of approximately three weeks. She was neither psychiatrically counseled nor formally tested while in that facility. The psychiatrists assigned to her case appeared more intent on forcing her to take a combination of neuroleptic drugs, to include Haldol, Navane, and Cogentin. (Haldol and Navane can cause tardive dyskinesia.) She resisted those attempts.
          A court ultimately ordered this woman released from the Center, stipulating that she was not to be administered drugs. On subsequently acquiring her medical records, under conditions which prevented censoring or doctoring of those records, she found that her psychiatrists had planned to inject her with drugs (in defiance of the court order) on the day of her release. As luck would have it, she was released a day early.
          This woman states also that she has met Budd Hopkins, of the Intruders Foundation, and that she had a long-term, confiding relationship with John E. Mack, Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and founding Director of the Center for Psychological Studies in the Nuclear Age (previously named, Research Program for the Study of Human Continuity; and, still previously, rumored to have cooperated with the CIA in studies of “human ecology”).
          At one point in their relationship, Professor Mack apparently accompanied this woman to a “support group” meeting of UFO abductees, who, she observed bemusedly, “spent their time comparing [extraterrestrially] implanted devices.” Professor Mack is on record as promoting the perception that UFO abductions are legitimate.[9]
          We frankly doubt that extraterrestrials who have a means to commute intergalactically would stoop to implanting comparatively primitive devices in human beings. However, should it be proved that the psychiatrist, surgeon and DoE Project Manager discussed above are extraterrestrials posing as humans, we will be happy to weigh that information. If it is similarly established that the vehicular “abduction” of the woman discussed above was the work of an extraterrestrial named Kaplan, who is posing as a human with Cornell Medical Center connections, we will be happy to ponder that as well.
          In the meantime, it would seem reasonable that the government would want the public to believe that extraterrestrial visitations are on the upswing. Mind-altering drugs, externally-induced auditory input, holographic projections (also a DoD capability),[10] appropriately focused directed-energy targeting, device implantations, special effects and abductions are all within this government’s capabilities and can be used for purposes of creating illusions of UFO experiences. Persons not cognizant of this might be more inclined to fall for the UFO mythologies now being officially “legitimized.”
    * * *
          Other cases, possibly involving U.S. Navy Intelligence, NSA, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and, peripherally, members of former Soviet Bloc intelligence services will be discussed in future reports.

    Harassment Objectives

          In his book, Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, Dr. Harvey Weinstein quotes the following passage from a book entitled,Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brainwashing, by William Sargant (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1957):
          “By increasing or prolonging stresses in various ways, or inducing physical debilitation, a more thorough alteration of the person’s thinking processes may be achieved. ...If the stress or the physical debilitation, or both, are carried one stage further, it may happen that patterns of thought and behavior, especially those of recent acquisition, become disrupted. New patterns can then be substituted, or suppressed patterns allowed to reassert themselves; or the subject may begin to think or act in ways that precisely contradict his former ones.
          “‘...If a complete sudden collapse can be produced by prolonging or intensifying emotional stress, the cortical slate may be wiped clean temporarily of its more recently implanted patterns of behavior, perhaps allowing others to be substituted more easily.’”
          Dr. Weinstein then comments: “The parallel with [Dr. Ewen] Cameron’s theory of differential amnesia is striking, and the relationship to brainwashing is abundantly clear.”[11] Dr. Cameron, employed by McGill University’s Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, between 1943 and 1964, conducted brainwashing experiments upon select, non-volunteer psychiatric patients on behalf of the CIA. Dr. Weinstein’s father was one of Cameron’s victims.
          Sargant’s theorems and Cameron’s associated experimental findings appear to be the driving force behind the harassment and experimentation now being reported to this Association. All of these individuals are being subjected to a series of overlapping circumstances which apparently are meant to induce and sustain long-term extremes of stress. All of these individuals have been effectively isolated. Unethical psychiatrists and physicians are involved in the majority of these cases. Mind-altering prescription drugs are being used for clearly non-therapeutic purposes. Evidence of LSD use is also beginning to surface (one of Cameron’s favored mind-altering substances). And “psychic driving” techniques—Cameron’s pet brainwashing method—are involved in all these cases, to a much greater and more potentially effective degree where auditory input is involved.
          The long-term objectives of these harassment and experimentation campaigns appear to be quite fundamental; viz.,
          (1) induce a sense of perverted “loyalty” toward the very agencies engaged in the individual’s harassment, to confuse his or her priorities where the possibility of obtaining legal redress might be concerned;
          (2) redirect the targeted individual’s feelings of hopelessness, anger and frustration toward racial and ethnic groups, and toward select, prominent political figures, to include the President of the United States; and
          (3) force the individual to commit an act of violence, whether suicide or murder, under conditions which can be plausibly denied by the government.
          An operation’s ultimate success apparently hangs on this latter objective. We have successfully obstructed this process in a number of cases now being investigated.

    The “Stalker” Phenomenon

          In recent weeks, considerable publicity has been given the trauma suffered by victims of “stalkers” (persons who obsessively surveil, harass and, in some cases, kill targeted individuals for assorted, unfathomable reasons). Movie stars who have been stalked recurrently make the news. Stalking, as a problem, is in fact becoming widespread, to the point where, in some States, the activity has finally been specifically proscribed by law.
          The individuals in contact with our Association are reporting the same terrifying ranges of experiences as are now being reported in the press on behalf of other victims of stalkers. The only difference in the cases reported to us is that the stalkers operate in groups over extremely prolong periods of time, and (it would appear) with the blessing of certain agencies of the U.S. Government. The laws being passed to protect victims of stalkers are clearly being selectively applied. We hope to put an end to this situation; that is, in addition to achieving the objectives discussed above.
          It should be noted that the FBI, though unwilling to intervene in the cases described above recently intervened on a massive scale to protect Joy Silverman, a Bush-appointed trustee of the J.F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, from the ardent “stalkings” of her estranged paramour, Sol Wachtler, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals for the State of New York.[12]
          Wachtler had apparently threatened to kidnap Silverman’s daughter if not paid $20,000. Since no kidnapping had occurred, and the case qualified merely as an attempted extortion, a question arises as to why the New York State Police could not have handled this investigation. Mrs. Silverman resides in New York.
          It would appear that the FBI devoted more than 100 agents and technicians to the effort, resolving the case within approximately 30 days. On November 7, 1992, the day of his arrest, Wachtler ran a gauntlet of 80 FBI special agents on the Long Island Expressway. Apparently the FBI does not have enough to do, if staking out a lone stalker is their top priority. We have to wonder, of course, if the FBI’s massive response was prompted by what was perceived to be Wachtler’s usurpation of governmental stalking prerogatives.
          Mrs. Silverman’s $300,000 donations to Republican Party causes could be considered a basis for the FBI’s solicitous concern for her welfare. It would appear, under the circumstances, that the “stalking victims” discussed above—being by now quite poverty-stricken—should abandon all hope of FBI intervention in their respective situations. FBI protection appears to have a price tag, which not one of our contacts can afford.

    There can never be any justification for torture. It creates an escalation of violence in the internal affairs of states. It spreads like a contagious disease from country to country. It has lasting effects on the mental and physical health of the victim and brutalizes the torturer. It is our fundamental duty as human beings to express what is surely the conscience of humanity and to eradicate this evil.

          [Amnesty International, February 1990, in the context of the U.S. Government’s continuing failure to ratify the U.N. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, dated December 10, 1984]


    * 71 (7-30-93)
    * 59 (7-30-93)

    [1] Peters, Edward, Torture, Basil Blackwell, Inc., New York/London, 1985.
    [2] The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, OH, June 28, 1991, p. 4-B (“Psychiatrist Testifies at mom’s Hearing”); November 6, 1991, (“Woman Ruled Competent for Trial”); and December 21, 1991, p. 4-C (“Ruling Expected Monday on Sanity of Parma Mother/Woman says she stabbed her 3 children to protect them”).
    [3] The Washington Post, June 1, 1991, p. C-I (“‘Voices’ Led to Tragedy for 2 Men/Pentagon Suspect’s Mother Says Institutions Should Have Held Son”) and December 14, 1991, p. D- 3 (“Suspect in Pentagon Killing Is Found Unfit to Stand Trial”).
    [4] The Washington Post, September 4, 1992, p. D-3 (“Freight Train kills Woman Near Home in Silver Spring”).
    [5] Jane’s Security and Co-In [Counter-Insurgency] Equipment, (Surrey, UK, 1991-92), as a preliminary source, contains a number of references to attaché-case concealment devices, for use in surveillance/communications operations. The electronic components are built into the bottom interior of these cases. Obviously the man just described could not have carried a “microcircuitried” attaché case aboard a U.S. airliner without first clearing Security. We are advised by a former CIA DDS (Security) employee that credential-carrying members of U.S. Intelligence can bypass airport security checks of their carry- on luggage.
    [6] St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch, October 15, 1986, p. 1-A (“U.S. Used Humans for Radiation Guinea Pigs”).
    [7] See, for example, Weinstein, Harvey M., M.D., Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, D.C., 1990; Marks, John, The Search for the “Manchurian Candidate”: The CIA and Mind Control, Times Books, New York, 1979; Delgado, Jose M. R., M.D., Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Harper & Row, New York, 1969; and Hutchison, Michael, Megabrain: New Tools and Techniques for Brain Growth and Mind Expansion, Ballantine Books, New York, 1986.
    [8] According to a Vancouver Sun archivist, Hollywood Hospital, Ltd. (a privately-owned institution), went out of business in 1975, two years after this woman’s hospitalization and after approximately 30 years of doing business. The event coincided with findings by the U.S. Senate Church Committee concerning the CIA’s brainwashing experiments under MKULTRA. Our contact also identified the Director of Hollywood Hospital as Dr. Ross MacLean—information also confirmed by the Vancouver Sun. Nothing in these records, copies of which are being obtained, points to CIA involvement with the hospital. Perhaps a portion of history has been overlooked. Cornell Medical Center’s role in MKULTRA is a matter of public record. (See, for example, Thomas, Gordon, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse, Bantam Books, New York, 1989).
    [9] The Roper Organization, Unusual Personal Experiences: An Analysis of the Data from Three National Surveys, (Bigelow Holding Corp., Las Vegas, NV, 1991. Contributors lending “credibility” to this publication include John Mack and Budd Hopkins.
    [10] Defense Week, October 19, 1992, Vol. 13, No. 41, pp. I and II, (“Pentagon, State [Department] Collaborate on Counterterror Gear”).
    [11] Op. cit., Weinstein, pp. 140-141.
    [12] The Washington Post, November 10, 1992, p. A-I (“An Unlikely Suspect for Scandal/Top N.Y. Judge Accused of Breaking Law in Secret Life”)."

    TOP TUNE!  



    EXTRACT - part only






    In this research program, we plan to investigate a revolutionary new

    form of communication based on the microwave auditory effect. This

    proposed communication idea satisfies the requirements for an

    innovative, natural interface requiring no learning or training for

    efficient operation and effective communications. The purpose of the

    program proposed here is to extend the results of a recent

    feasibility study, performed for the Armstrong Laboratory/OEDR. The

    study found that voice communications, via the microwave auditory

    effect, are highly feasible. In Phase I of this SBIR, we propose to

    investigate the range of potential applications for this radically

    different form of voice communication and recommend hardware and

    systems concepts suitable for laboratory and brassboard

    demonstrations to be built under Phase II.

    Up to Contents



    Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems

    edited by Dr. James C. Lin, University of Illinois

    1989 Plenum Press, New York

    Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Interactions of

    Electromagnetic Waves with Biological Systems, held as part

    of the Twenty-Second General Assembly of the International

    Union of Radio Science, Aug 25 - Sept 2, 1987, in Tel Aviv,


    ISBN 0-306-43109-2

    QP82.2.N64E44 1989

    612.01448-dc19 88-38957


    Eleanor White's comments on this posting:

    This book focusses on NON-ionizing radiation, and contains

    detailed texts about NON-THERMAL effects.  In other words,

    "right up our alley".

    The main use of this book is to show that it is easy for

    electromagnetic signals to cause radio frequency hearing and other

    effects at LOW power levels.  This in turn can be used to explain why

    DETECTION is so very difficult.

    I don't understand the biological jargon, however, a few of the more

    plain-language paragraphs STUNNINGLY verify that with careful choice

    of signal frequency and modulation, not only can the body's cells

    detect the modulation envelope of an incoming radio signal (i.e.

    function as a "cellular crystal set") but even AMPLIFY these

    carefully formed signals.  (Amplification of other effects, such as

    proneness to disease, is also covered in the book.)

    "Detection", in terms of radio signal reception, means that some

    portion of the reciever "rectifies", that is, turns the AC of the

    incoming signal into varying DC.  If this conversion is not done,

    voice to skull wouldn't work.

    The book touches also on ways in which cells communicate, and

    shows that electromagnetic fields of relatively weak power levels

    can affect intercellular communication, which is, as I understand

    the subject, what the brain is "all about".

    Bio-amplification is apparently why radio signals of very low average

    power ("MICROwatts" per NASA) can still produce audio effects,

    and no doubt plays a part in difficulties in detection.

    When two more characteristics of voice to skull are factored in:

    1. The carrier signal can be "hopped" continuously within the

       bioeffective bandwidth, known as "spread spectrum" transmission,


    2. The voice modulation most effective for undetectable hypnosis

       is evidently a voice shifted just above normal hearing, but still

       audible to the brain, have a recipe for incredibly difficult signals to detect.

    This book is a mainstream publication, very well suited to use

    in our publicity and persuasion campaigns, and our dealings with

    authorities who claim radio signals don't affect living tissue

    except to heat it.

    Finally, many thanks to Blanche Chavoustie for providing me

    photocopies of this book - a saintly work!


    Page 110:


    At that time [1953] excitatory mechanisms in nerver fibers

    and nerve cells were grouped under a common rubric of ionic

    equilibrium mechanisms.  There was little interest in the

    possibility that functional organization of mebranes of cell

    bodies might involve threshhold sensitivities to both

    oscillating EM fields and to molecular stimuli at energy

    levels substantially lower than predicted by Hodgkin-

    Huxley models, and substantially below typical threshholds

    in nerve fibers.

    Much recent research cited below has shown that imposed weak

    low frequency fields (and radiofrequency fields amplitude-

    modulated at ELF frequencies) that are many orders of

    magnitude weaker in the pericellular fluid [fluid between

    adjacent cells] than the membrane potential gradient [voltage

    across the membrane] can modulate actions of hormone, anti-

    body neurotransmitter and cancer-promoter molecules at their

    cell surface receptor sites.

    From their electrical characteristics, these sensitivities

    appear to involve nonequilibrium and highly cooperative

    processes that mediate a major amplification of initial

    weak triggers associated with binding of these molecules at

    their specific cell surface receptor sites.

    (Adey, 1983, 1986, 1987; Adey and Lawrence, 1984; Lawrence

    and Adey, 1982).

    Page 122:

    Cooperative Modification of Calcium Binding by RF Fields

    at Cell Surfaces with Amplification of Initial Signals

    Initial stimuli associated with weak perpindicular EM fields

    and with binding of stimulating molecules at their membrane

    receptor sites elicit a HIGHLY COOPERATIVE modification of

    Ca++ binding to glycoproteins along the membrane surface.

    As noted above, a longitudinal spread is consistent with

    the direction of extracellular current flow associated with

    physiological activity and imposed EM fields.  This cooper-

    ative modification of surface Ca++ binding is an

    AMPLIFYING STAGE, with evidence from concurent initial molecular

    binding events by imposed RF fields that there is a far greater

    increase in Ca++ efflux than is accounted for in the events of

    receptor-ligand binding (Bawin and Adey, 1976; Bawin et al,

    1975; Liu-Liu and Adey, 1982).

    Page 124:


    Enzymes are protein molecules that function as catalysts,

    initiating and enhancing chemical reactions that would not

    otherwise occur at tissue temperatures.  This ability resides

    in the pattern of electrical charges on the molecular surface.

    In the fashion of more familiar chemical catalysts, such as

    the hydrocarbon oxidation systems which function only at very

    high temperatures in automotive exhaust systems, a catalyst

    emerges unchanged from these reactions and is thus able to

    participate indefinitely in a specific reaction.

    Activation of these enzymes and the reactions in which they

    participate involve energies millions of times greater than

    in the cell surface cell surface triggering events initiated

    by the EM fields, emphasizing the MEMBRANE AMPLIFICATION

    inherent in this trans-membrane signaling sequence.

    Page 131:


    Stimulus Amplification in Cooperative Systems


    It is therefore clear that OBSERVED EM field interactions

    with cells and tissues based on oscillating ELF tissue gradients

    between 10 E-7 and 10 E-1 volts per centimeter would involve

    cooperativity MANY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE GREATER than envisaged in

    the examples just cited.

    In part this discrepancy appears to relate to far greater

    sensitivities to low-frequency EM fields [EW: ELF, that is, the

    "entrainment" frequencies] and to RF fields with low-frequency

    amplitude-modulation [EW: this includes radar hearing signals]

    than to imposed step functions or DC gradients [EW: common

    with contact electrodes, not of interest in mind control at a

    distance] used in many electrochemical experiments and models

    to test levels of cooperativity in biological systems.

    (Blank, 1972)

    [EW: In plain language, both entrainment (ELF) fields and

    pulsating radar-like (RF) fields are a hell of a lot more

    influential on cells than some experimental work using DC

    and electrode methods.]

    Page 95:

    [EW: This section is not part of the demonstration that EM

    signals can be biologically amplified, as above.  It's main

    interest is that a magnetophosphene "gun" was under consider-

    ation by the U.S. National Institute of Justice in 1993, along

    with a "fever" gun and a "convulsion" gun, both using micro-

    wave technology.  As of 1999, nothing has been heard from NIJ

    on this development, however, page 95 here suggests that such

    a microwave weapon is feasible.]


    An effect of time-varying magnetic fields on humans was first

    described by d'Arsonval (1896) [EW: Anyone doubt there has

    been some progress since 1896?] is the induction of a flicker-

    ing illumination within the visual field field known as

    magnetophosphenes.  This phenomenon occurs as an immediate

    response to stimulation by either pulsed or sinusoidal magnetic

    fields with frequencies less than 100 Hz, and the effect is

    completely reversible with no apparent influence on visual

    acuity.  The maximum visual sensitivity to sinusoidal magnetic

    fields has been found at a frequency of 20 Hz in human subjects

    with normal vision.

    [EW: Radio signals are a combination of electric and magnetic

    fields.  To radiate a 20 Hz signal would require such huge

    antennas that it is impractical to do so.  I'd recommend that

    if someone has the facilities and skills, I'd try some VHF (or

    microwave) pulsing at 20 Hz on an RF carrier at, say, the 2-meter

    (144-148 MHz) ham band with a duty cycle, say, of 20% pulse-ON


    Up to Contents



    Microwaves and Behavior

    Dr. Don R. Justesen

    Laboratories of Experimental Neuropsychology

    Veterans Administration Hospital

    Kansas City, Missouri

    as published in

    American Psychologist

    Journal of the American Psychological Association

    Volume 30, March 1975, Number 3

    ................ Eleanor's comments .........................




    This article describes in precise terms how Dr. Joseph C.

    Sharp and staff transmitted the WORDS for the digits 1 to 10

    using a modulated version of an Allan Frey type pulsed

    microwave transmitter.  A detailed description of Frey

    transmitters can be viewed at:

    Appendix PM2

    The relevant text is below.


    Page 396:


    The demonstration of sonic transduction of microwave energy

    by materials lacking in water LESSENS the likelihood that a

    thermohydraulic principle is operating in human perception

    of the energy.  Nonetheless, some form of thermoacoustic

    transduction probably underlies perception.  If so, it is

    clear that simple heating is NOT a sufficient basis for the

    Frey effect; the requirement for pulsing of radiations

    appears to implicate a thermodynamic principle.

    Frey and Messenger (1973) and Guy, Chou, Lin, and Christen-

    sen (1975) confirmed that a microwave pulse with a slow rise

    time is INeffective in producing an auditory response; only

    if the rise time is SHORT, resulting in effect in a square

    wave with respect to the leading edge of the envelope of

    radiated radio-frequency energy, does the auditory response


    [Eleanor's comment:  This is why we don't "hear" ordinary

    radio and TV signals.]

    Thus the rate of change (the first derivative) of the

    waveform of the pulse is a CRITICAL factor in perception.

    Given a thermodynamic interpretation, it would follow that

    information can be encoded in the energy and "communicated"

    to the "listener".

    Communication has in fact been demonstrated.  A. Guy (Note

    1), a skilled telegrapher, arranged for his father, a retired

    railroad telegrapher, to operate a key, each closure and

    opening of which resulted in a pulse of microwave energy.

    By directing the radiations at his own head, complex mess-

    ages via the Continental Morse Code were readily received

    by Guy.

    Sharp and Grove (note 2) found that appropriate modu-

    lation of microwave energy can result in "wireless" and

    "receiverless" communication of SPEECH.  The recorded by

    voice on tape each of the single-syllable words for digits

    between 1 and 10.  The electrical sine-wave analogs of each

    word were then processed so that each time a sine wave


    pulse of microwave energy was triggered.

    [Eleanor's comment:  This is, in effect a form of what is

    called pulse-RATE modulation.]

    By radiating themselves with these "voice modulated"

    microwaves, Sharp and Grove were READILY able to hear,

    identify, and distinguish among the 9 words.  [Typo?]

    The sounds heard were not unlike those emitted by persons

    with artificial larynxes.

    Communication of more complex words and of sentences was

    not attempted because the averaged densities of energy

    required to transmit longer messages would approach the

    current 10 milliwatts per square centimeter limit of safe


    The capability of communicating directly with a human being

    by "receiverless radio" has obvious potentialities both

    within and without the clinic.  But the hotly debated and

    unresolved question of how much microwave radiation a human

    being can safely be exposed to will probably forestall

    applications within the near future.


    Up to Contents



    A Warning to the World from Russian Psychotronic Researchers

    Unclassified FOIA document, courtesy Cheryl Welsh, which is a bulletin

    circulated among U.S. government agencies reviewing an October 6, 1995

    Russian TV news segment titled "Man and Law" on the topic of mind

    control technology.  The images below complement another video produced

    by German ZDF TV and shown on December 22, 1998.  The 1998 video's

    transcribed sound track, in English is posted at:

    Here are the images of the FOIA document:

    Up to Contents







    Date sent:        Fri, 10 May 1996 17:52:55 -0700 (PDT)



    Subject:          MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 73

        V E R I C O M M / MindNet         "Quid veritas est?"


    The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the

    views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless

    otherwise noted.

    Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for

    non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the

    copy remain intact and unedited.

    Editor: Mike Coyle

    Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

    Research: Darrell Bross



    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Physiological Responses Applicable to Development of

    Less-Than-Lethal Weapons

    Sponsored by National Institute of Justice

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Less-than-lethal weapons have a variety of applications in law

    enforcement, including rescuing hostages, stopping fleeing

    felons, and quelling prison disturbances. The National Institute

    of Justice is sponsoring a broad program to develop new

    techniques for "friendly force" as an alternative to the use of

    deadly force. As part of this program, Oak Ridge National

    Laboratory (ORNL) is examining approaches based on known

    physiological responses to certain types of stimuli. These

    "weapons" would temporarily incapacitate an individual or a

    group with no lasting physiological damage. These concepts are

    based on ORNL's experience and expertise in biological-based

    systems and biophysical responses, particularly in evaluating

    the physical responses of humans to a variety of chemical,

    physical and radiological agents. ORNL also has extensive

    experience and expertise in risk analysis and in risk assessment

    and modeling.

    The ORNL less than-lethal weapons project sponsored by the

    National Institute of Justice began in September 1993. The

    following tasks are being performed:

    *   Locate and compile data from tests, accidents, medical

        literature, etc. on biological and biophysical responses

        to energetic stimuli (such as electromagnetic fields).

    *   Analyze the information and identify promising candidate

        mechanisms for further development for a friendly force

    *   Evaluate the applicability of the proposed approaches to

        several realistic scenarios (such as hostage rescue or riot


    ORNL has already examined several possible concepts for

    less-than-lethal weapons based on known physiological responses

    to energetic stimuli, including a thermal gun, a seizure gun,

    and a magnetophosphene gun. A thermal gun would have the

    operational effect of heating the body to 105 to 107F, thereby

    incapacitating any threat, based on the fact that even a slight

    fever can affect the ability of a person to perform even simple

    tasks. This approach is built on four decades of research

    relating radio frequency exposure to body heating. A seizure gun

    would use electromagnetic energy to induce epileptic-like

    seizures in persons within the range of a particular

    electromagnetic field. The magnetophosphene gun is designed

    around a biophysical mechanism which evokes a visual response

    and is thought to be centered in the retina, known as

    magnetophosphenes. This effect is experienced when a person

    receives a blow to the head and sees "stars". This same effect

    can be produced with electromagnetic energy. While there are a

    number of technical challenges to be overcome in building

    devices of these types, less-than-lethal weapons based on

    physiological responses to energetic stimuli would provide a

    safe and effective means of dealing with a number of law

    enforcement situations where use of deadly force is not


    For further information contact:

    Ray Downs, National Institute of Justice (202) 616-3509 Susan

    Sherrow, Oak Ridge Special Projects Office (615) 576-8024

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy

    Laboratory Managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.


    MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn173.txt]

    To receive the MindNet Journal via email:

    Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

    To unsubscribe:

    Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

    Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our=20

    FTP Archive site:=20


    MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt]

    Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet

    Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy

    weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,

    bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics

    will be accepted with the author's statement of permission

    to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or

    reject for publication. The publisher disclaims all

    responsibility to return unsolicited matter. Send articles

    for submission to:

    , or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,

    POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

    VERICOMM / MindNet and its agents disclaim any and all

    responsibility or liability for any and all claims and/or

    guarantees, express or implied, and delivery of products,

    merchandise, and/or services offered for sale by

    advertisers and/or authors within the MindNet Journal.

    The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,

    , VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA

    94604-2314 USA.

    The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in=20

    cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,

    Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.


    Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Section A, November 22, 1976

    Mind-Altering Microwaves:  Soviets Studying Invisible Ray

    A newly declassified U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency report

    says extensive Soviet research into microwaves might lead to

    methods of causing disoriented human behavior, nerve disorders,

    and even heart attacks.


    A copy of the study was provided by the agency to the Associated

    Press in response to a request under the Freedom of Information



    Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating

    intercranially (within the head) can be induced by signal

    modulation at very low average power densities, the study said.


    One physiological effect which has been demonstrated is heart

    seizure, the report said.

    It said this has been accomplished experimentally in frogs

    by synchronizing the pulses of a microwave signal with the

    animal's heartbeat and beaming the radiation at the chest



    Microwave News, January-February 1987


    Six hundred scientists and engineers with security clearances

    spend the first week of December at Kirtland Air Force Base in

    New Mexico examining the potential of high-power microwaves to

    zap enemy electronics...

    ... Many branches of the Department of Defense were represented,

    including the Air Force, the Army and the Navy, together with

    DARPA, DIA, and DNA.  The Lawrence Livermore Labs were also

    well represented, as were most of the big defense contractors -

    General Dynamics, Physics International and TRW each have a

    high-power microwave testing facility.

    In addition to these sources, susceptibility and hardening,

    there was one on biological effects:  Dr. David Erwin and

    Major Robert Downs represented the Air Force and Howard Bassen

    and Dr. John D'Andrea described the Army and Navy programs,

    respectively.  Dr. Frank Barnes of the University of Colorado

    in Boulder presented a poster paper on his and Dr. Howard

    Wachtel's research on the effects of pulsed microwaves.

    Chuck de Caro, a former correspondent for the Cable News Network,

    considers the possibility that the U.S. is falling behind the

    U.S.S.R. in microwave weapons in "The Zap Gap", to be published

    in the March issue of "The Atlantic" (see also MWN November-

    December 1986).


    Microwave News, January-February 1996

    RF WEAPONS - Disabling People and Electronics

    The military continues to explore development of RF weapons

    for the conflicts of the future.  For instance, the "First

    Directed Energy Warfare (DEW) Conference", held last year

    at the Mitre Corp. in McLean VA, featured Dr. David Erwin

    of the Armstrong Lab at Brooks AFB, San Antonio, TX, on

    "Directed Energy Warfare RF Effects", and D.r Jose Pina of

    the CIA on "Ground Combat Applications of RF".  Other topics

    included "Personnel Vulnerability" and Directed Energy

    Warfare Biological Effects".

    The June meeting was organized by the Association of Old

    Crows, whose members are specialists in electronic warfare.

    Conference participants had to have security clearances of

    "Secret" or higher, as has been the case at similar meetings

    in the past (See MWN, J-F 87 and N-D 93).

    Public discussions of RF/MW weapons have focussed on dis-

    rupting technology.  But a recent Article in the Airpower

    Journal revealed "for the first time that the military is

    developing high-powered microwave weapons for use against

    human beings", reports Peter Cassidy in the January 1996

    "Progressive" (see p. 14).

    RF/MW and EMF-based weapons are also being studied for

    civilian law enforcement.  Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    (ORNL) in Oak Ridge TN will soon complete a literature

    review for the National Insitute of Justice on the

    feasibility of "thermal guns" which could heat the body to

    105 to 107 degrees F and incapacitate the target; "seizure

    guns" which would use EM energy to induce epileptic-like

    seizures; and "magnetophosphene guns" which would cause

    the target to "see stars".

    The institute's Ray Downs in Washington cautioned that the

    report may not be made public.  ORNL's Dr. Clay Easterly

    has said that some effects not associated with heating

    could be useful in developing nonlethal weapons.

    (See MWN, N-D 93.)


    Microwave News, September-October 1996, page 19

    Stop That Car or We'll Zap You

    They're the sexiest gadgets in this year's action movies:

    EMP weapons, which use electromagnetic pulses to zap

    electronics.  They have starring roles in Goldeneye, the

    latest James Bond movie, as well as in Broken Arrow, Escape

    From LA, and Eraser.  And soon they may be coming to a

    police car near you.

    Law Enforcement News (September 30) reports that the U.S.

    Army and the National Institute of Justice are running a

    $500,000 field test to see if EMP guns can force a car to

    stop by disabling its electrical systems.  The plan is to

    use EMP to do away with high speed chases (another Hollywood

    staple).  This is another example of the growing interest in

    using nonlethal weapons developed by the military.


    Up to Contents



    Eleanor White's comments:

    This article shows clearly the military's intent to use

    every possible thought-influencing technology.  This technology

    is largely classified but there are leaks, like this article.

    We involuntary test subjects can tell you from first hand

    experience that far more invasive devices now exist.

    This article represents one of the two parallel "tracks" on

    which thought-influencing technology is being used and

    further developed:

    - Radio frequency signals, based on the WW II

      phenomenon called "radar hearing"

    - Ultrasound signals, which can be transmitted

      through the air or piggybacked on to radio/TV




    Volume 5, Issue 6

    October/November 1998

    $25/6 issues/ 1 year

    1998 Nexus New Times



    EXCERPT: More in magazine.


    Military Use of Mind Control Weapons

    Judy Wall 1998


    For years, rumours have persisted that the United States Department

    of Defense has been engaged in research and development of

    ultra-sophisticated mind- altering technology. Confirmation of this

    came to me recently in the form of two ITV News Bureau Ltd (London)

    wire service bulletins.[1]

    The March 23, 1991 newsbrief, "High-Tech Psychological Warfare

    Arrives in the Middle East", describes a US Psychological

    Operations (PsyOps) tactic directed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait

    during Operation Desert Storm. The manoeuvre consisted of a system

    in which subliminal mind-altering technology was carried on

    standard radiofrequency broadcasts. The March 26, 1991 newsbrief

    states that among the standard military planning groups in the

    centre of US war planning operations at Riyadh was "an unbelievable

    and highly classified PsyOps program utilising 'silent sound'


    The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein's

    military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops

    were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry

    encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency.

    The US PsyOps team set up its own portable FM transmitter,

    utilising the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji.

    This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with

    patriotic and religious music, PsyOps transmitted "vague, confusing

    and contradictory military orders and information".

    Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work: a

    sophisticated electronic system to 'speak' directly to the mind of

    the listener, to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate

    his brain's electroencephalograph ic (EEG) patterns and

    artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear,

    anxiety, despair and hopelessness. This subliminal system doesn't

    just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it

    implants that emotion in their minds.[2]

    I noticed that the ITV wire service was from outside the United

    States.  Readers of Resonance may recall that in the

    Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline in issue no. 29, reference is made

    to the documentary video, Waco: The Big Lie Continues, which

    contained video footage of three EM weapons. This segment of the

    film was from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). I

    wondered if there was any significance to this.

    At the library I pulled up back issues of my local newspaper for

    the same time-period of the Gulf War to see what the American wire

    services had said, if anything, about the use of this special

    PsyOps weapon. There was nothing said about it directly, but three

    news articles seemed related. In a news release from Associated

    Press during the same timeframe of the Gulf War truce, I read:

    "The American pilot who shot down the second Iraqi warplane in 48

    hours said Friday that continued Iraqi flights suggested that US

    warnings were not filtering down to Iraqi pilots… He said he hopes

    Saddam gets the message now.  'It's really too bad that these

    people have to die for their unwillingness to heed our warnings...

    What I really think is, they don't communicate down to the people,'

    he said. 'If they have a communications problem, I suggest they fix


    That may have been coincidence but two earlier news articles, dated

    March 1, 1991, apparently have a common origin with the ITV news

    bulletin. The first article[4] tells us that approximately 100

    members of the US 101st Airborne Division, fluent in Arabic, talked

    the enemy into surrendering. These soldiers rode in the Apache

    helicopter gunships that were involved in the longest

    helicopter-borne assault in history. They told the Iraqi troops

    that they would be slaughtered if they didn't give up.

    "They got the point," one soldier is quoted as saying.

    This all sounds very unremarkable, except when you read the

    editor's note: "The following dispatch was subject to US military

    censorship." Now why would they want to censor such a mundane

    tactic, except out of embarrassment that the US Army fighting

    forces had fallen to the level of a cheer-leading squad?

    ... in which case they would have nixed the thing entirely.

    But upon re-reading the article, we may pick out certain key

    phrases (emphasised in italics):

    "He [the soldier interviewed] was one of dozens of Arabic speakers

    that played a key role in the allied ground attack against Iraq,

    and part of an attempt by the US Army to use finesse, intelligence

    work and tactics to complement brute strength."

    If we fill in the missing blanks with such descriptions as "the

    megaphone was used to direct psychoacoustic frequencies that

    engaged the neural networks of the enemy's brain, causing him to

    think any thought and feel any emotion that the Americans chose to

    lay on him", then it starts to make sense. And it would no longer

    seem so surprising that one soldier could talk 450 enemy soldiers

    into surrendering. The possibilities are there, and, as the next

    article[5] documents, that is exactly what happened. Iraqi troops

    gave up en masse.

    We quote: "They were surrendering in droves, almost too fast for us

    to keep up with..."; "...two Iraqi majors, both brigade commanders,

    who gave up their entire units..."; and " of them gave up to

    an RPV [remotely piloted vehicle). Here's this guy with his hands

    up, turning in a circle to give himself up to a model airplane with

    a camera in it."

    Irrational? Not if there was also a voice being beamed into his

    head from that little flying toy, saying, "Give up, give up!"

    Otherwise, how do we account for the editor's note at the beginning

    of the article: "The following is based on pool dispatches that

    were subject to military censorship." Without that note, we could

    smugly think that the Iraqi soldiers were cowards or crazy, but why

    censor that idea?


    The mind-altering mechanism is based on a subliminal carrier

    technology: the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS), sometimes

    called "S-quad" or "Squad". It was developed by Dr Oliver Lowery of

    Norcross, Georgia, and is described in US Patent #5,159,703,

    "Silent Subliminal Presentation System", dated October 27, 1992.

    The abstract for the patent reads:

    "A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the

    very low or very high audio-frequency range or in the adjacent

    ultrasonic frequency spectrum are amplitude- or frequency-modulated

    with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or

    vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the

    use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The

    modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may

    be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or

    optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the


    According to literature by Silent Sounds, Inc., it is now possible,

    using supercomputers, to analyse human emotional EEG patterns and

    replicate them, then store these "emotion signature clusters" on

    another computer and, at will, "silently induce and change the

    emotional state in a human being".

    Silent Sounds, Inc. states that it is interested only in positive

    emotions, but the military is not so limited. That this is a US

    Department of Defense project is obvious.

    Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds, Inc., says this about

    S-quad in a letter dated December 13, 1996:

    "All schematics, however, have been classified by the US Government

    and we are not allowed to reveal the exact details... ... we make

    tapes and CDs for the German Government, even the former Soviet

    Union countries! All with the permission of the US State

    Department, of course... The system was used throughout Operation

    Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully."

    The graphic illustration, "Induced Alpha to Theta Biofeedback

    Cluster Movement", which accompanies the literature, is labelled

    #AB 116-394-95 UNCLASSIFIED" and is an output from "the world's

    most versatile and most sensitive electroencephalograph (EEG)

    machine". It has a gain capability of 200,000, as compared to other

    EEG machines in use which have gain capability of approximately

    50,000. It is software-driven by the "fastest of computers" using a

    noisenulling technology similar to that used by nuclear submarines

    for detecting small objects underwater at extreme range.[6]

    The purpose of all this high technology is to plot and display a

    moving cluster of periodic brainwave signals. The illustration

    shows an EEG display from a single individual, taken of left and

    right hemispheres simultaneously.  Ile readout from the two sides

    of the brain appear to be quite different, but in fact are the same

    (discounting normal leftright brain variations).


    By using these computer-enhanced EEGs, scientists can identify and

    isolate the brain's low-amplitude "emotion signature clusters",

    synthesise them and store them on another computer. In other words,

    by studying the subtle characteristic brainwave patterns that occur

    when a subject experiences a particular emotion, scientists have

    been able to identify the concomitant brainwave pattern and can now

    duplicate it. "These clusters are then placed on the Silent

    Sound[TM] carrier frequencies and will silently trigger the

    occurrence of the same basic emotion in another human being!"

    Up to Contents


    There is a lot more involved here than a simple subliminal sound

    system. There are numerous patented technologies which can be

    piggybacked individually or collectively onto a carrier frequency

    to elicit all kinds of effects.

    There appear to be two methods of delivery with the system. One is

    direct microwave induction into the brain of the subject, limited

    to short-range operations. The other, as described above, utilises

    ordinary radio and television carrier frequencies.

    Far from necessarily being used as a weapon against a person, the

    system does have limitless positive applications. However, the fact

    that the sounds are subliminal makes them virtually undetectable

    and possibly dangerous to the general public.

    In more conventional use, the Silent Sounds Subliminal System might

    utilise voice commands, e.g., as an adjunct to security systems.

    Beneath the musical broadcast that you hear in stores and shopping

    malls may be a hidden message which exhorts against shoplifting.

    And while voice commands alone are powerful, when the subliminal

    presentation system carries cloned emotional signatures, the result

    is overwhelming.

    Free-market uses for this technology are the common self-help

    tapes; positive affirmation, relaxation and meditation tapes; as

    well as methods to increase learning capabilities.

    In a medical context, these systems can be used to great advantage

    to treat psychiatric and psychosomatic problems. As a system for

    remediating the profoundly deaf, it is unequalled. (Promises,

    promises. This is the most common positive use touted for this

    technology over the past 30 years. But the deaf are still deaf, and

    the military now has a weapon to use on unsuspecting people with

    perfectly normal hearing.)


    In fact, the US Government has denied or refused to comment on

    mindaltering weapons for years. Only last year, US News & World

    Report ran an article titled "Wonder Weapons", basically a review of

    the new so-called 'non-lethal' or 'less-than -lethal' weapons.' Not

    one word about S-quad, although the technology had been used six

    years earlier!

    Excerpts from the article read:

    "Says Charles Bernard, a former Navy weapons-research director: 'I

    have yet to see one of these ray-gun things that actually works…";


    DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) has come to us

    every few years to see if there are ways to incapacitate the

    central nervous system remotely,' Dr F. Terry Hambrecht, head of

    the Neural Prostheses Program at NIH, told US News, 'but nothing

    has ever come of it,' he said. 'That is too science-fiction and


    It may sound "science fiction and far-fetched" but it is not.

    However, that is just what the powers-that-be want you to believe,

    so as to leave them alone in their relentless pursuit of...what?

    The idea behind non-lethal weapons is to incapacitate the enemy

    without actually killing them, or, in the case of riot control or

    hostage situations, to disable the participants without permanent

    injury, preferably without their knowing it. The electromagnetic

    mind-altering technologies would all fall into this class of

    weapons, but since they are all officially non-existent, who is to

    decide when and where they will be used?

    And why should selected companies in the entertainment industry

    reportedly be allowed access to this technology when the very fact

    of its existence is denied to the general public?

    As recently as last month [February], this stonewall approach of

    total denial or silence on the subject still held fast, even toward

    committees of the US Congress!

    - The Joint Economics Committee, chaired by Jim Saxton (R-NJ),

    convened on February 25, 1998 for the "Hearing on Radio Frequency

    Weapons and Proliferation: Potential Impact on the Economy".

    Invited testimony included statements by several authorities from

    the military:

    - Dr Alan Kehs, of the US Army Laboratories, discussed the overall

    RF threat.

    - Mr James O'Bryon, Deputy Director of Operational Testing and

    Director of live fire testing for the Office of Secretary of

    Defense at the Pentagon, discussed the role of Live Fire Testing

    and how it plays a role in testing military equipment with RF


    - Mr David Schriner, Principal Engineer of Directed Energy Studies

    with Electronic Warfare Associates and recently retired as an

    engineer with a naval weapons testing facility, talked about the

    difficulty in building an RF weapon and about the terrorist threat.

    - Dr Ira Merritt, Chief of Concepts Identification and Applications

    Analysis Division, Advanced Technology Directorate, Missile Defense

    and Space Technology Center, Huntsville, Alabama, discussed the

    proliferation of RF weapons primarily from the former Soviet Union.

    Although these statements gave information of technical interest,

    they are perhaps more important for the information they did not

    give: information on the existence of radiofrequency weapons that

    directly affect the human brain and nervous system.


    This technology did not spring up overnight. It has a long history

    of development and denials of development-by the US Government and

    probably half of the other governments of the world as well.

    We know that the former Soviet Union was actively engaged in this

    type of research. In a previous article we reported that during the

    1970s the Soviet KGB developed a Psychotronic Influence System

    (PIS) that was used to turn soldiers into programmable 'human

    weapons'. The system employed a combination of highfrequency

    radiowaves and hypnosis. The PIS project was begun in response to a

    similar training scheme launched in the US by President Carter,

    according to Yuri Malin, former security adviser to USSR President


    In my Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline[9] I covered a period of 60

    years of interest and development in EM weapons—information

    gathered from the many articles and news clippings sent in by

    readers of Resonance. In my article on synthetic telepathy[10] I

    traced the development of the 'voice in your head' technology

    dating back to 1961, all my references coming from the open

    scientific literature.


    Jan Wiesemann has written an apt description of the situation which

    now exists in the United States, about the 'forces that be' and how

    the situation came about:

    "During the Cold War the United States not only engaged in a

    relatively open nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union, but also

    engaged in a secret race developing unconventional weapons. As the

    intelligence agencies (which prior to the Second World War had

    merely played a supporting role within the government) continued to

    increase their power, so did the funds spent on developing

    techniques designed to outsmart each other.

    "And as the US intelligence community began to grow, a secret

    culture sprang about which enabled the intelligence players to

    implement the various developed techniques to cleverly circumvent

    the democratic processes and institutions...

    "Like many other democracies, the US Government is made up of two

    basic parts the elected constituency, i.e., the various governors,

    judges, congressmen and the President; and the unelected

    bureaucracies, as represented by the numerous federal agencies.

    "In a well-balanced and correctly functioning democracy, the

    elected part of the government is in charge of its unelected

    bureaucratic part, giving the people a real voice in the agenda set

    by their government.

    "While a significant part of the US Government no doubt follows

    this democratic principle, a considerable portion of the US

    Government operates in complete secrecy and follows its own

    unaccountable agenda which, unacknowledged, very often is quite

    different from the public agenda. "[11]

    Jan goes on to quote one of the United States' most popular war

    heroes: Dwight D. Eisenhower, who served as Supreme Commander of

    Allied Forces during World War II and was later elected 34th

    President of the United States. In his farewell address to the

    nation in 1961, President Eisenhower said:

    "...we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry

    of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men

    and women are directly engaged in the defence establishment. We

    annually spend on military security more than the net income of all

    United States corporations.

    "This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large

    arms industry is new in the American experience. The total

    influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every

    city, every state house, every office of the federal government. We

    recognise the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not

    fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and

    livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our


    "In the councils of government, we must guard against the

    acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought,

    by the military -industrial complex. The potential for the

    disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must

    never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or

    our democratic processes."


    The United Nations was established in 1945 with the aim of "saving

    succeeding generations from the scourge of war". In 1975 the

    General Assembly considered a draft first proposed by .the Soviet

    Union: "Prohibition of the Development and Manufacture of New Types

    of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New Systems of Such Weapons".

    In 1979 the Soviet Union added a list of some types of potential

    weapons of mass destruction:

    1) Radiological weapons (using radioactive materials) which could

    produce harmful effects similar to those of a nuclear explosion;

    2) Particle beam weapons, based on charged or neutral particles, to

    affect biological targets;

    3) Infrasonic acoustic radiation weapons;

    4) Electromagnetic weapons operating at certain radio-frequency

    radiations which could have injurious effects on human organs.[12]

    In response, the US and other Western nations stalled. They gave a

    long, convoluted reason, but the result was the same.

    In an article entitled "Non-Lethal Weapons May Violate

    Treaties",[13] the author notes that the Certain Conventional

    Weapons Convention[14] covers many of the non-conventional

    weapons—"those that utilize infrasound or electromagnetic energy

    (including lasers, microwave or radiofrequency radiation, or

    visible light pulsed at brainwave frequency) for their effects".

    Harlan Girard, Managing Director of the International Committee

    Against Offensive Microwave Weapons, told me he believes the

    strategy behind the government's recent push for less-than-lethal

    weapons is a subterfuge. The ones that are now getting all the

    publicity are put up for scrutiny to get the public's approval. The

    electromagnetic mind-altering technologies are not mentioned, but

    would be brought in later under the umbrella of less-than- lethal


    These weapons were recently transferred from the Department of

    Defense over to the Department of Justice. Why? Because there are

    several international treaties that specifically limit or exclude

    weapons of this nature from being used in international warfare.

    In other words, weapons that are barred from use against our

    country's worst enemies (notwithstanding the fact that the US did

    use this weapon against Iraqi troops!) can now be used against our

    own citizens by the local police departments against such groups as

    peaceful protestors of US nuclear policies.


    The secrecy involved in the development of the electromagnetic

    mind-altering technology reflects the tremendous power that is

    inherent in it. To put it bluntly, whoever controls this technology

    can control the minds of men-all men.

    There is evidence that the US Government has plans to extend the

    range of this technology to envelop all peoples, all countries.

    This can be accomplished, is being accomplished, by utilising the

    nearly completed HAARP project[15,16] for overseas areas and the

    GWEN network now in place in the US. The US Government denies all


    Dr Michael Persinger is a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience

    at Laurentian University, Ontario, Canada. You have met him before

    in the pages of Resonance where we reported on his findings that

    strong electromagnetic fields can affect a person's brain.

    "Temporal lobe stimulation," he said, "can evoke the feeling of a

    presence, disorientation, and perceptual irregularities. It can

    activate images stored in the subject's memory, including

    nightmares and monsters that are normally suppressed."[17]

    Dr Persinger wrote an article a few years ago, titled "On the

    Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by

    Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms".[18] The

    abstract reads:

    "Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental

    algorithms by which all sensory transduction is translated into an

    intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct stimulation of these codes

    within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied

    electromagnetic patterns may require energy levels which are within

    the range of both geomagnetic activity and contemporary

    communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow

    band of brain temperature could allow all normal human brains to

    be. affected by a subharmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz

    would only vary by 0. 1 Hz."

    He concludes the article with this:

    "Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was

    improbable, but which is now marginally feasible. This potential is

    the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of

    the approximately six billion brains of the human species, without

    mediation through classical sensory modalities, by generating

    neural information within a physical medium within which all

    members of the species are immersed.

    "The historical emergence of such possibilities, which have ranged

    from gunpowder to atomic fission, have resulted in major changes in

    the social evolution that occurred inordinately quickly after the

    implementation.  Reduction of the risk of the inappropriate

    application of these technologies requires the continued and open

    discussion of their realistic feasibility and implications within

    the scientific and public domain."

    It doesn't get any plainer than that. And we do not have open

    discussion because the US Government has totally denied the

    existence of this technology.


    I would like to give special thanks to: Jan Wiesemann for sending

    the Silent Sounds[TM] statement and patents which were the keystone

    of this article; Mike Coyle, whose computer search turned up many

    more related patents; Harlan Girard, who has provided numerous

    official government documents; and to the many who have provided

    newsclippings and articles, moral and financial support to

    Resonance, without which we'd have ceased publication long ago.

    About the Author:

    Judy Wall is Editor and Publisher of Resonance, the Newsletter of the

    MENSA Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group.  pp.11--13,15-16

    Up to Contents




    The Threat to Civil Liberties

    by Judy Wall, Editor/Publisher RESONANCE

    Newsletter of the MENSA Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group

    NEXUS Magazine, October-November 1999

    Vol. 6,  No. 6

    Judy Wall can be contacted by mail at:

    Judy Wall, Editor/Publisher


    684 County Road 535

    Sumterville      FL

    USA           33585

    Eleanor White's comments:  This hard hitting article by Judy Wall, who

    is NOT a mind control victim and in fact avoids victim testimonials in favour

    of only factual objective material, contains some POWERFUL items not widely

    known among involuntary mind control experimentees.

    The most important facet of this article is that Judy Wall presents evidence

    unknown to most of the public IN SPITE OF ITS BEING UN-CLASSIFIED, and in

    the public domain for the past two decades.

    The main technology used is a mix of ultrasonic voice or brain entrainment,

    mixed with microwave voice-to-skull or ordinary radio and TV signals,

    described in detail in Appendix US1:


    The microwave voice-to-skull technology is described in the 1974 article

    from American Psychologist magazine, Appendix PM6:




    The United States Air Force uses aerial mind-control broadcasts against

    civilian population as well as enemy troops.  Some of these actions against

    civilians are done with the intent of influencing public opinion and the

    outcome of elections.

    In a previous article, we examined mind-control technology, especially that

    utilizing Silent Sound [TM], in which radio-frequency broadcasts carry

    subliminal patterns that entrain the listener's brainwaves into a pre-

    selected emotional state.  According to ITV wire service reports, this

    technology was used during Operation Desert Storm in 1991, as part of the

    US Psychological Operations (PsyOps) directed against Iraqi troops. [1,2]

    To the Desert Storm offensive we can now add several other incidents.

    Alex Horvat, editor of The Probe, calls to our attention the 1998

    video, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control, produced by Bob Fletcher.

    "The excerpt played on Fletcher's video is from TLC (The Learning Channel)

    and clearly states that Commando Solo was used in Haiti for what was called

    Operation Uphold Democracy.  As the general populace was violently

    opposed to Aristide and most in favor of his ouster, it took nearly a year

    of this clandestine counter-programming to get them to change their minds.

    Instead of butchering a population physically, we can no manipulate them

    mentally, virtually enslaving their thoughts with a criss-cross pattern

    of flights by an EC-130 (which is just a C-130 heavily laden with electron-

    ic hardware.) [3]

    We were not at war with the citizens of Haiti, yet the U.S. Government

    directed military weapons against this friendly, or at least neutral,

    civilian population.  The U.S. Government sanction the "rigging" of the

    Haitian election by mental control of the people, programming them to cast

    their votes for the Americans' favored candidate.  And they had the nerve

    to call it "Operation Uphold Democracy".  Some sense of humor!

    Stalin would have loved it.  Hitler would have loved it.  Why is the U.S.

    Government doing this?  Who is behind this flagrant violation of civil

    liberties?  Is it the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) which has a

    long history of interfering in foreign government politics?  Or has this

    become standard military procedure?

    The rationale is always the same: "to make the world safe for democracy".

    Yet what is democracy if not freedom?  Freedom to think your own thoughts;

    freedom to express your own opinions; freedome to vote for the candidate

    of your own choice.

    Fletcher's video also mentions that the same technology was used against

    the Bosnia population for a week to influence their election. [4]  This

    was probably done during Operation Joint Guard in 1995. [5]

    The questions arise:  If they have used mind-control broadcasts against

    foreign civilian populations to influence elections, will they use them
    against American citizens -- or have they already?  What other countries

    may be the recipients of this innovative technology?

    Just what is this EC-130E Commando Solo?  The United States Air Force has

    helpfully published a fact sheet that describes the Lockheed built air-

    craft. [6]  This 1995 bulletin states that the "unit flyaway cost" is more

    than US $100 million each, and that there are eight in the inventory.  Its

    primary function is "Psychological operations broadcasts".  The crew 

    consists of four officers (pilot, copilot, navigator, control chief/EWO)

    and seven enlisted members (flight engineer, loadmaster, five mission


    According to the fact sheet:

    "Air Force Mission:  Commando Solo conducts psychological operations and

    civil affairs broadcast missions in the standard AM, FM, HF, TV and

    military communications bands.  Missions are flown at maximum altitudes

    possible to ensure optimum propagation patterns.  The EC-130 flies during

    either day or night scenarios with equal success, and is air refuealable.

    A typical mission consists of a single ship orbit which is offset from the

    desired target audience.  The targets may be either military or civilian


    "Secondary missions include command and control communications counter-

    measures (C3CM) and limited intelligence gathering.

    "Air Force Features:  Highly specialized modifications have been made to

    the latest version of the EC-130.  Included in these modifications are

    enhanced navigation systems, self-protection equipment, and the capability

    of broadcasting color television on a multitude of world-wide standards

    throughout the TV VHF/UHF ranges.

    "Air Force Background:  Air National Guard EC-130 aircraft flown by the 

    193rd Special Operations Group were deployed to both Saudi Arabia and

    Turkey in support of Desert Storm.  Their missions included broadcasts of

    'Voice of the Gulf' and other programs intended to convince Iraqi soldiers

    to surrender.

    "The EC-130 was originally modified using the mission electronic equipment

    from the EC-121, known at the time as the Coronet Solo.  Soon after the

    193rd SOG received its EC-130s, the unit participated in the rescue of US

    citizens in Operation Urgent Fury, acting as an airborne radio station 

    informing those people on Granada of the US military action.

    "Volant Solo, as the mission is now known, was instrumental in the success

    of coordinated psychological operations in Operation Just Cause, again

    broadcasting continuously throughout the initial phases of the operation."

    Operation Just Cause?  this is another propaganda name, applied to

    the U.S. invasion of Panama to take out that country's leader, General

    Noreiga, the CIA's erstwhile partner in drug smuggling.  Apparently the

    General had made someone mad -- how else to account for the massive in-

    vasion of this tiny tourist country?  To wit:  "A superpower whipped the

    poop out of 10 percent of the police force of a Third World nation.  You

    are supposed to be able to do that.  It was done well, and I credit those

    who did it.  But it is important that we draw the right lessons from it"

    according to an anonymous US Marine. [7]

    Our Commander-in-Chief had another point of view:  "...the roll call of 

    glory, the roster of great American campaigns -- Yorktown, Gettysburg,

    Normandy, and now Panama."

    --President George Bush, March 1990 [8]


    In a phone call to the USAF Special Operations Command Public Affairs 

    Office, I questioned the legitimacy of using these subliminal broadcasts

    against civilian populations. [9]

    [Judy Wall's article on Silent Sound for details.]

    I was told that it was all perfectly legal, having been approved by the

    U.S. Congress (!).  It may be okay by Congress, but I sincerely doubt that

    it would be approved by the recipient populations.

    That conversation also elicited more information concerning the Commando

    Solo units.  For instance, the Air National Guard 

    of the individual states in the U.S. can also operate 

    Commando Solo aircraft, should the Governor of a state 

    request assistance.  That means the PsyOps mind-control 

    technology can be directed against

    U.S. citizens.

    The Commando Solo aircraft have participated in the following missions--

    possibly more, as the early missions of Volant Solo 1 were not known to

    this spokesperson:

    - Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada, Oct-Nov 1983, Jan-Jun 1985)

    - Operation Just Cause (Panama, late December 1989)

    - Operation Desert Shield (Kuwait, Iraq, from August 1990)

    - Operation Desert Storm (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq, 1991)

    - Operation Uphold Democracy (Haiti, 1994-1995)

    - Operation Joint Guard (Part of a UN oepration in

      Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1995)

    - Operation Desert Thunder (part of a UN operation in Iraq)

    - Operation Desert Fox (Iraq, 2 to 3 days in December 1998)

    Other countries are known to have a similar aircraft, but the PR officer

    declined to identify them, suggesting that I check out Jane's Defence

    Weekly for such information.  Not having access to that particular

    publication, I searched through my copy of Jane's Radar and Electronic

    Warfare Systems 1993094. [10]  The Commando Solo unit was not listed,

    but a browse through the book was informative as to the numerous types of

    electronic offence and defence systems available.  These include sta-

    tionary and mobile land units (many housed in large trucks), shipboard and

    airborne models as well as well as space-based technology.
     If the military

    is spending US $100 million per airborne unit (times eight, we're talking

    US $800 million here), I think it is safe to assume that they have tried

    out mind control equipment with less expensive, roving land units (trucks),

    but use the airplanes to cover wider areas and hard-to-reach locations of

    the world.

    And I might add, we can asume that they have tried out the efficacy of this

    mind-control technology.  Even the US military would not waste $800 million

    on something unless it has been proven to work, and work effectively, even

    under the adverse situation of military combat.  This is an important


    The initial research into mind control in the USA was conducted udner the

    auspices of the CIA.  The flagrant abuse of human rights in experimenting

    on unsuspecting persons was based on the supposition that the veracity of

    experiments would be compromised if a subject knew that he was participating

    in an experiment.  In the case of mind-control technology, tehis supposition

    might very well be true.  But that does not justify its use -- or so said

    the Nuremburg Code, the tenets of which were used as a legal basis to pro-

    secute Nazi scientists for war crimes.  However the US seems to have

    excused its own military and scientific community from adhering to that

    Code. [11]


    The next logical step in mind control would be to incorporate this tech-

    nology into satellite communications.  Since other countries are known

    to have similar capabilities, there could occur a sitution in which

    electronic mind control warfare is waged against a civilian population,

    receiving conflicting mental manipulation from both sides.  What would be

    the mental state of individuals so targetted?  Would it cause a rise in

    mental aberrations and schizophrenia?  And what are the limits of mind

    manipulations?  Can people be forced to commit suicide?  Can physical

    ailments or psychosomatic illnesses be induced?

    A March 1990 report from Bosnia-Herzegovina in the former Yugoslavia sug-

    gests the latter may have already happened.  The report concerns 2,990

    ethnic Albanians who were admitted to hospital with complaints of lung and

    skin problems for which doctors could find no physical cause. [12]

    It is not a far step from manipulating a person's emotional state to influ-

    encing bodily functions.  Indeed, much of the literature on documenting

    microwave effects on biological systems deals with precisely this phenom-

    enon.  In fact, studies of the physical effects of microwave exposure

    (including radio frequencies) generally preceeded studies of mental effects.

    A meeting sponsored by Defense & Foreign Affairs and the International

    Strategic Studies Association was held in Washington DC in 1983.  High-level

    officials from many countries met for this conference.   They discussed

    psychological strategies related to government and policymaking.  A summary

    of the agenda reads:  "The group will be discussing the essence of future

    policymaking, for it msut be increasingly clear to all that the most effec-

    tive tool of government and strategy is the mind...  If it's any consolation

    to the weapons-oriented among defense policymakers, the new technologies of

    communications -- satellites, television, radio, and mind-control

    beams -- are 'systems' which are more tangible than the more

    philosophically  based psychological strategies and operations.

    [Eleanor White's comment:  Anyone know where to get a copy?]

    "But we should make no mistake; it will be the 'psychologically based'

    systems which determine the world's fate in coming years:  the condition of

    the minds of populations and leaders.  And we should not ignore the fact

    that the USSR [this was in 1983] is working on electronic systems to

    'beam' messages directly into the brain.  What good, then, are conventional

    systems if these types of weapons are not countered?  And, on a more basic

    level, what good is a weapon system if public opinion or political con-

    straints prohibit its deployment?" [13]

    It is obvious that they found the answer to that last question.  If the

    public does not know about a weapon system, it cannot prohibit its deploy-

    ment.  This is the situtation that applies to mind-control technology.

    Deadlock Frequency - "Born into Wasteland" by BlankTV

    The BT FON NETWORK:  map of FON Network
    RF (microwave?) Mind Control Map - BT FON Network - BT the Unlawful Killings Network Operator for DRONE WARFARE by the NAZI Secret Government of SCHERF (aka Bush) 4th Reich

    And perhaps now we know, why quite so many people just DON'T WAKE THE FUCK UP.  Unlike of course, in SPAIN, where they've been RIOTING for TWO YEARS NOW!  Unlike in GREECE, where the've been RIOTING for TWO YEARS NOW; rEVOLUTION EUROPE!  DEMAND IT!

    Hey ... MASSIVE GLOBAL COMPANY, 'British' Telecommunications; provider of MURDER COMMUNICATIONS to the US MILITARY ;) You're NAILED!?  Time Ewe DECIDED!

    DEMAND A PUBLIC ENQUIRY in the UK; DEMAND MONITORING of the FREQUENCIES being used; and more than ANYTHING ... design and PUBLISH without restraint of copyright nor Patent nor Design rights, the TECH to DETECT **AND COUNTER** this DEMOCRACY MURDERING TECH!


    Don't be SUCH A DUMBO!

    Accept the REAL REALITY!  Before it's TOO LATE!  ....

    As it already may be, for the CHILDREN BORN INTO THE FON CLOUD!


    I cannot suggest ANYONE takes possibly ILLEGAL ACTIONS, like DOWNING TOWERS or SHIELDING the BT BOX on YOUR STREET with LEAD,, if no TRUTH comes OUT AND RIGHT AWAY; I cannot, and do not, do that.  Hell no, that would be SELF-DEFENCE, wouldn't it????


    I sent a request out by TWITTER about 48 hours ago; URGENTLY CROWD-SOURCE A LIST of EVERY LAST SATELLITE PRODUCER on PLANET EARTH; and EVERY LAST DIRECTOR of ALL of those companies, SINCE RECORDS BEGAN ... time we saw, some CONNECTIONS people! And got that intel RIGHT into the HANDS of EVERY LAST POLITICIAN YOU KNOW just as FAST as POSSIBLE.  NO MORE ***BULLSHIT*** EXCUSES!

    The fact NO government has come forwards and ADMITTED this TECH; tells EWE everything Ewe need to KNOW the REAL AGENDA RIGHT WORK inside TWO BOXES on average on almost EVERY STREET in the ENGLAND; not however, NOT IN SCOTLAND, you know, ...

    Friday, 11 October 2013

    HOME OF the SCOTTISH, Rite! ;) 

    Wednesday, 21 August 2013

    The White Rabbit!  
    PS Send friends Hero Humans! That's how we grow!  Send:
    TWEET/FACEBOOK(1): #OccupyTheBanks Operation #OTB

    No comments :

    Post a comment

    Only members (obviously) can comment; no moderation; direct to page.

    Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.