Saturday, 21 July 2012


Do note the discussion has kicked off (see comments at the bottom of the page); do feel free to add your thoughts, links, etc.  No reason to be shy (except you might get assassinated by the leader of the 'free' world, that is - heh!)


WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.

(Editors note: The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012 search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term "Obama". Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity in the absence of the availability of original documents.)
By Dan Crosby

of The Daily Pen

KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain. The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.
In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.

The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.

It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963. ... (continues)"



The White Rabbit!
Follow @occupyofficial - U Need ... The White Rabbit! ;~)


Public Key Transaction Processor - create digital asset vaults)
EN | GR | ES | FR | PT | IT | PL

#OTB - Open-Transactions - create crypto-currencies & markets
EN | GR | ES | FR | PT | IT | PT

Follow @occupyofficial - U Need ... The White Rabbit! ;~)
Buying Gold

 Operation Occupy The Banks - Hashtag = #OTB | Twitter | WWW | #OTB 


  1. A grand total of 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Twenty-one.

    What are the odds that Obama’s mother flew ALONE (WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama’s father was in Hawaii in August 1961) late in pregnancy from Hawaii to Kenya, about ten thousand miles/

    What are the odds that she did that despite the Kenyan government saying that it never happened?

    What are the odds that she made the flight, despite the government of Kenya saying that thet it never happened AND there is a birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii?

    The birth certificate has been confirmed by officials of both parties in Hawaii, further confirmed by the public Index Data file ( a public file showing the birth certificate in the records showing one for Obama in 1961) and by the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the newspapers in Hawaii in 1961---which notices at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and which only sent out notices for births in Hawaii in 1961.

  2. There is now good evidence that some of the people who claimed that Obama's birth certificate was forged are lying:

    Here are some experts who say that Obama's birth certificate was not forged:

    Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said: “The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

    Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it. … I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

    John Woodman, independent computer professional, said in a series of videos that the claims of fakery that he examined were unfounded.

    Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: "All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document." (WND did not quote that part of his statement. I wonder why?)

    Further research on the birther claims that Obama's birth certificate is forged:

  3. Very interesting comments; thanks for making them first of all. Truly.

    Second, we cover this issue here because AFAICT, never before in the history of the United States of America, has so little been known about a President's background, nor (again, AFAICT) has any President gone to such great lengths (and very huge expense) to ensure no one found out more about it.

    In our view, both of those facts are worrying.

    Now, it's important to note we are NOT based inside the United States; we may have missed things only broadcast inside the United States, but alone, the fact there has not been a string of women coming forwards to say "I slept with the President when he/I were at X location", etc, is unusual (compare and contrast for instance, with Bill Clinton). We mean by this, who didn't sleep around a little when younger; much money to be made from such stories, yet NOTHING; NOT ONE WOMAN has come forwards.

    Three ideas spring forwards, possibly four; all controversial:

    1) Barack Obama is Tim Osman; CIA Agent or Asset; this accounts for the huge time/efforts spent to cover up his background from investigation; this ties in PERFECTLY with the Dark Cabal; this also ties in with a credible, ex-NSA, researcher's research;

    2) Barack Obama was born illegitimate; the person who appears as his father, indeed, is not. In fundamentalist Christian USA, this would be a reason for the cover-up, but without real concern over actual eligibility (AFAICT it would be an ELECTORAL liability, possibly even preclusion from office in such a fundamentalist religious society as the USA, but not per se, illegal [though producing a false document is obviously a crime if done with the purpose of fraud on anyone; the Sheriffs point; SOMEONE produced the document {if it is false}, and if false, that is a crime UNDER HIS JURISDICTION];

    3) Actually, he spent time on Mars; this accounts for the absence of traceability in records held in public archives on earth. This does not account for the birth certificate issue (though it could in other related ways I have no time to explain now).

    However batshit that third one sounds, keep in touch with this blog, for this is not a suggestion made by someone with no credibility, far from it. We will be covering this suggestion, in due course (once we have people understanding the depths of the deceptions surrounding the secret space program in much more detail, and much more importantly, have put some of the science on site).

    4) Barack Obama is either gay or Bisexual; this would account for a huge level of control exercised over him at all times. So many wish to see Mr Obama as a 'good guy' (despite just MOUNTAINS of evidence to the contrary - Gitmo, NDAA, endless list now), yet, despite all the promised change, nada, really. Obviously such an easily controlled candidate, would be the perfect pick for the Dark Cabal, ESPECIALLY if one combines MORE THAN ONE of these suggestions.

    Wild, huh!

    Time may, or may not tell. But the eligibility of the most powerful man on earth TO BE in issue, shows the abject failure of the USA political system. The man should never have got into office with any of these questions unresolved. We do understand there may have been some legal move to ensure this never happens again, and frankly, that's a great idea!

    The White Rabbit! :~)

  4. We just tracked a link into this page, to see what it said; interestingly, not just this:

    "According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958. However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

    Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa. "


  5. And you believe that crap?

    Let's try this again. ONLY 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. So the people who are making up this stuff about the files are making the incredible claim that Obama and his mother were two of the 21. And they are making that claim despite the fact that IF Obama were born in Kenya, the Bush Administration would have known about it because the parents would have had to have filed applications for travel documents for him in the US consulate in Nairobi (or he would not be allowed in, of course), and the applications would still be on file, and so the Bush Administration would have found them--IF they existed.

    There is another obvious problem with this claim. The claim that they did research in the files for "The British Protectorate of East Africa." But the name of that was changed to "The Kenya Colony" back in 1920. So they are lying about the files that they looked into, if they looked into anything at all.

    And, guess what, the officials of the Kenya government say that they did research on the claim that Obama was born in Kenya, and there was nothing to the claim. Jon Chessoni, first Secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, DC, said, speaking of inquiries the Embassy received about President Obama being born in Kenya: “When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.” (The McCain campaign and probably the Hillary campaign made similar checks and found nothing.)

    Who were the people or the news agency who looked into the files? No names, no name of agency? Surprising omission. Who is it who can be trusted to say "several sources?" No mention of who is claiming the sources, no way to determine if they are telling the truth.

    Much is made of certain files being missing, but the idea that Hillary (who if you recall does not like Obama very much) would ask the British to seal them, is absurd. Even more unlikely is that the British would do it. Even more unlikely would be that the British would do it, and the fact that they had sealed files would not leak like crazy.

    So, this all is based on an unknown researcher or news agency making claims. In contrast, the officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that Obama was born in Hawaii, and this is further confirmed by the Index Data (a public file showing the birth certificates that are on file, showing one for Obama in 1961) and by the birth notices that were sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH (and only by the DOH) in 1961.


Only members (obviously) can comment; no moderation; direct to page.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.