Sunday, 2 November 2014

BREAKING: 80 TRILLION *URGENT* SELL THIS STOCK

TOM HENEGHAN INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS
ALL Patriot Americans MUST know, with sources inside
American/European intelligence agencies and INTERPOL,
reporting what is really going on behind the scenes of the
corporate-controlled, fascist, extortion-friendly
propaganda U.S. media's massive deceptions

Protect and defend  YOUR  Constitution Bill of Rights,
the Supreme Law of the United States
http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/
https://twitter.com/Tom_Heneghan


Sunday   November 2, 2014

80 TRILLION in Yen, Oh My!

by Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert

source


UNITED States of America   -   It can now be reported that $40 trillion principle plus interest accruals tied to the World Financial Settlements and the Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols were ILLEGALLY converted and cross-collateralized by the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve and the Central Bank of Japan into $80 trillion of Japanese yen derivatives.

The Central Bank of Japan, along with the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve are now counter parties to each other with the pension funds of U.S. and Japanese citizens now totally at risk!

P.S.  This latest derivative ponzi scheme started when Alibaba CEO Jack Ma and U.S. banking giant JPMorgan wrote derivatives on U.S. pension funds enabling the Alibaba IPO (Alibaba IPO stock issue) to be issued at $98 a share rather than $68 a share.

P.P.S.  The latest Japanese yen ponzi scheme is nothing more than a short term bank 'Bail-Out', which will be followed by a massive bank 'Bail-In' LOOTING the entire pension funds of American citizens coinciding with a collapse of worldwide equities.

Reference:  Don't be fooled, folks.  The banks are currently short in the entire world equity markets.  So, if you own Alibaba, SELL IT!

Stay tuned for future intelligence briefings including an update on both the U.S. Military and the Chinese Military complete opposition to their current governments.

Note:  The recent crashes involving NASA rockets.

______________________________

Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 04:24:36 -0800
From: somam@prodigy.net
Subject: ISA_ US Code - Chapter 11 - Part 1 - Title 18 USC Section 201<BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS and WITNESSES_circa2014
To: scheduling@who.eop.gov; info@barackobama.com; potus44@whitehouse.gov; bom.omb@whitehouse.gov; info@mail.whitehouse.gov; scheduling@ovp.eop.gov; breed@ovp.eop.gov; ahoffman@ovp.eop.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; askdoj@usdoj.gov; oig@sec.gov; jroberts@supremecourt.gov; johnroberts@supremecourt.gov; flotus44@whitehouse.gov; govgeneral@wisconsin.gov; jeannet@rebeccaforreal.com; gretawire@foxnews.com; newsletter@vanhollenforag.com; criminal.division@usdoj.gov; USUNPublicAffairs@state.gov; ethics@imf.org; jlew@who.eop.gov
CC: houston@ic.fbi.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov


Writer Marilyn M. Barnewall acknowledges via tape recording in her possession, that " Mr. X " in Thieves' World ( Simon & Schuster - 1994 ) was FBI Assistant Director Jim Moody...

Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:32 PM
Subject: ISA_ US Code – Chapter 11 – Part 1 – Title 18 USC Section 201<BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS and WITNESSES_circa2014

United States Department of Justice / Criminal Division
Attn: Assistant Attorney General, Leslie R. Caldwell
Washington, DC 20530.0001 USA
via- email Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov

In the matter of : Continuing Direct Violations of the United States Constitution, RICO Statutes, as listed;

Pursuant to :

a. Title 18 USC Section 4 – Misprision of Felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the
United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge
or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

My Mandated Presidential Authority / The Honorable, Ronald W Reagan [ Executive Branch ] :
1. Totten Doctrine ( 92 U.S. 105, 107) Effective : January, 1981,
2. Presidential Executive Order No. 12333,
3. U.S Department of State / Rogers – Houston Memorandum,
4. National Security Directive / Operation : STILLPOINT
5. National Security Decision, Directive No. 166 ( March 27, 1985 – Afghanistan ),
6. U.S. Office of Special Counsel / OSC File No. MA – 11 – 3630 ( AUG 29, 2011 ), et al ….

In reviewing the continuing United States Obstruction of Justice Responsibilities and Judicial Issues, I am leaglly obligated under the Presidential Mandate to clearly state, once again the following Judicial Issues for your immediate compliance,

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/17/puppetgate

Whereas, The President of the United States of America, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing Corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community.

http://polymontana.com/ambassador-lee-emil-wanta/

http://www.wantarevelations.com/evidence/WANTA-Book.pdf

ISA_ US Code - Chapter 11 - Part 1 - Title 18 USC Section 201<BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS and WITNESSES_circa2014

To: President Barack H Obama <>; U.S. President Barack H. Obama <>; POTUS_U.S. President Barack H. Obama <>; Chief Justice_John G Roberts <>; Chief Justice_John G Roberts <>; Attorney General Eric Holder <>; United States of America <>; Governor Scott Walker <>; WI_Gov Scott Walker <>; U.S. SECY TREASURY_JACK LEW <>; U.S. Spkr John Boehner <>; Office of Inspector General <>; First Lady_Michelle Obama <>; OVP_Vice President Joe Biden <>; OVP_Alan L Hoffman <>; OVP_Chief of Staff Bruce Reed <>

Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 5:17 PM

info@mail.whitehouse.gov, potus44@whitehouse.gov, scheduling@who.eop.gov, jroberts@supremecourt.gov, jroberts@supremecourt.gov, askdoj@usdoj.gov, USUNPublicAffairs@state.gov, govgeneral@wisconsin.gov, govgeneralreply@wisconsin.gov, jlew@who.eop.gov, office@messages.speaker.gov, inspector.general@usdoj.gov, flotus44@whitehouse.gov, scheduling@ovp.eop.gov, ahoffman@ovp.eop.gov, breed@ovp.eop.gov

Subject: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/02/23/wanta-wisconsin-corruption/

SIMPLE REMINDER RELATING TO THE CONTINUING LAWLESS AND DIRECT VIOLATIONS TO DENY THE RELEASE OF U.S. TAXABLE RECEIPTS, IDENTIFIED INA. U.S. DISTRICT COURT - EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF VIRGINIA - CIVIL ACTION  No. 1:07 CV 609 T3E / BRP;LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA ( INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE SHAREHOLDER OF AMERITRUST GROUPE, INC., ACOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA REGISTERED CORPORATION ), PETITIONER,

Vs

HENRY M. PAULSON, JR.SECRETARY OF THE TREASURYUNITED STATES TREASURY, ANDROBERT M KIMMITTDEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURYUNITED STATES TREASURY, ANDJAMES R. WILKINSONCHIEF OF STAFFUNITED STATES TREASURY, ANDMICHAEL CHERTOFFSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND, ANDALBERTO R. GONZALESATTORNEY GENERALUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMONDDIRECTOR AND/OR MANAGER OF OPERATIONS RESPONDENTS.B.

U.S. DISTRICT COURT - EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - ALEXANDRIA DIVISION -  CIVIL ACTION No. 02 - 1363 - AAMBASSADOR LEO WANTA, PLAINTIFF,  vs UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.PAGE 10, PLAINTIFF'S SOLE REMEDY IN THIS MATTER IS TO PROCEED WITH THE LIQUIDATION OF THE CORPORATIONS AND REPORT THESE TRANSACTIONS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE AND THEN CHALLENGE THE ASSESSMENT OF ANY TAXES IN A REFUND PROCEEDING.DATED : APRIL 15, 2003/S/ GERALD BRUCE LEEUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGEPLEASE TAKE NOTICE : BANK OF CHINA - BEIJING REMITTED A CLEAR INWARD REMITTANCE OF USDollars 4.5 TRILLION TO LEO E WANTA [MAY 2006] DIRECTLY PER FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND U.S. DISTRICT COURT TESTIMONY. ( CIVIL ACTION No. 1:07 cv 609 T3E/BRP )C. STATE OF WISCONSIN - CIRCUIT COURT - BRANCH 2 - COUNTY OF DANE and  DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN [ TWO (2) DIFFERENT COURT IDENTITIES ];  CASE No. 92 - CF - 683, MAY 8, 1995;D. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR LEO E WANTA, SOMALIA AMBASSADOR TO CANADA AND SWITZERLAND, DIPLOMATIC PASSPORTS No. 03462, 12535, PETITIONER, Vs. SECRETARY RICHARD G. CHANDLER, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE;ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Witness No. 1 Written Testimony - Writer Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall - dated, May 21, 2014 11:26 PM { Update Information : Writer Barnewall (Please Listen to Below-mentioned WAV attachment, as Ms. Barnewall's name is clearly mentioned; denys that Former South Dakota Senator Sheldon R. Songstad offered her personally USDollars 1.2 Billion for her contribution in writing " Wanta! Black Swan, White Hat " - She states it was USDollars 1.0 Billion only.}

~~~~~~~ " that the Supreme Court Solicitor General from 2001 - 2004, Ted Olson, had diverted his (Wanta's) Supreme Court Appeal when it was filed in 2003. .....

Back to Solicitor General Ted Olson :  Interestingly, I talked with a man [ and tape recorded the entire conversation of Philip X. Wainright (U.S.N.R.) with the writer of Wanta! Black Swan, White Hat (Amazon.com)] who provided a great deal on information to Claire Sterling when she wrote her book, Thieves' World (Simon & Schuster, 1994).

He says the manuscript was changed by the publisher from the original one written by Sterling and submitted to the publisher. " She wrote positive things about Leo Wanta and his efforts in Russia," he told me. When I pointed out to him that in her book Sterling had called Wanta a " snake oil salesman," and some other choice negatives, he informed me that an editor (he provided his name) at Simon & Schuster had made changes of substance to the text. He also provided the name of an Assistant FBI Director - " Jim Moody " who had positioned himself as " Sterling's "Mr. X " in the book and who had received a hefty pay off by Simon & Schuster.

"Mr. X " was an important character in that portion of Thieves' World that dealt with Leo Wanta, the Soviet Union / Russian Cold War (Evil Empire) situation and focused on the Soviet Mafiya. The gentleman with whom I spoke - and he knew a great deal about what happened in the Soviet Union and about Claire Sterling - identifies himself as "Mr. X." ..... One of the side remarks he made when we exchanged comments was that Ted Olson had followed him around Atlanta, that he was a very nasty person, and at one time Olson has used the name " Rick Reynolds, " a name given exclusively to Secret Agent Leo Emil Wanta (Totten Doctrine - SA233MS) by President Ronald Reagan. That bit of information certainly made me wonder who else might have used the intelligence names bestowed upon Leo Wanta ... and what might they have done using his undercover names?"" There is no doubt that Mr. Olson was in a position to divert the Wanta Supreme Court Appeal... and because of his affiliation with President Reagan's office, there is no doubt he knew who Leo Wanta is. There is also no doubt that he is part of the Bush 'family.""Unfortunately for the perpetrators, the Supreme Court Case Number assigned by the Court to the Wanta case conflicts with a case involving another individual - someone of whom Ambassador Wanta has never heard of. In essence, two case numbers attached to the Wanta Appeal on the Supreme Court's own Web pages. Case No. 02-1363 and #02-1544. There should not be two case numbers assigned to a single appeal. Yet, #02-1544 is listed in the Court's own records when I found Case #02-1363 ... a big clue that something was wrong with this filing. Another clue that something is wrong: the Court's Decision went beyond the time limit allowed for its response.""Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts was (and is still) a material witness on behalf of United States Secret Agent Leo/Lee Emil Wanta. And a strange thing happened on the way to the Forum, Brutus - I mean on the way to the Supreme Court.""The Supreme Court Appeal was filed by Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, Plaintiff, vs. Secretary Richard G. Chandler, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, et al. There are others parties listed as Respondents and the include James E. Doyle, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, Douglas Haag, former Assistant Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, Grant C. Johnson, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, Jack C. Voight, Wisconsin State Treasurer, Judith Coleman, Clerk of the Dane County Circuit Court in Wisconsin, United States Attorney General John Ashcroft, and United States Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill.""There are some questions that need to be answered regarding Case No. 02-1363 ... the Certiorari.1. Did Chief Justice Roberts acknowledge his working and Presidential relationships established when he worked as legal counsel for President Reagan at the White House? Those relationships involved Secret Agent Leo Emil Wanta and are documented by the Reagan Library. The documents at the Reagan Library include two notes to White House Chief Counsel Fred Fielding regarding Leo Wanta (5/301984) and other correspondence involving secret agent Leo E. Wanta on May 29, 1984, May 31, 1984, etc. The files released by the Library include F06-007 and F05-139/01. There are others dealing with Wanta's suggested appointment as Inspector General at the Department of Defense, correspondence to now Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts about Leo Wanta from the President's office, etc.2. Did Chief Justice Roberts recuse himself from the Decision the Supremes now say was made during their Judicial Conference of May 2003?I, personally, will probably never believe the Supreme Court made this Decision in May of 2003. I believe a Decision had to be made before information regarding the Protocols could be presented to the Supremes and I believe the Wanta Appeal was hidden and not presented to the Court in 2003.The Petition was denied - but that's not the important thing. Take a look at the Title in the actual document. "Leo Wanta, Somalia Ambassador to Canada and Switzerland ...">>>>Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:56 AMSupreme Court Plunk 02-1544 - Wanta 02-1544???From : "Marilyn Barnewall"To : " Ambassador Leo Wanta "No. 02-1544Status :DECIDEDTitle:Gerald Frank Plunk, Petitionerv.United StatesDocketed:Lower Ct:United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 2003Search Results: Docket for 02-1363<>http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/02-1363.htmTitle:Leo Wanta, Somalia Ambassador to Canada and Switzerland, aka Lee E. Wanta, Petitioner v. Richard G. Chandler, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, et al.No. 02-1363 02-1544)QUOTE - End of Witness No. 1 Written Testimony - Writer Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall


Subject: ISA_ US Code – Chapter 11 – Part 1 – Title 18 USC Section 201>>>

Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:56 AM

Supreme Court Plunk 02-1544 – Wanta 02-1544???
From : "Marilyn Barnewall"
To : " Ambassador Leo Wanta "

No. 02-1544
Status :  DECIDED
Title:  Gerald Frank Plunk, Petitioner  v.  United States
Docketed:
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 24, 2003
Search Results: Docket for 02-1363

Title: Leo Wanta, Somalia Ambassador to Canada and Switzerland, aka Lee E. Wanta, Petitioner v. Richard G. Chandler, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, et al.
No. 02-1363 02-1544)

QUOTE – End of Witness No. 1 – Writer Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DUTY, HONOR and COUNTRY – w / Calm and American Courage Forever and a Day

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
18 U.S.C. § 201 : US Code – Section 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses

(a) For the purpose of this section –
(1) the term "public official" means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;
(2) the term "person who has been selected to be a public official" means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and
(3) the term "official act" means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official's official capacity, or in such official's place of trust or profit.
(b) Whoever – (1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent –
(A) to influence any official act; or
(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person; (
2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for: (A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;
(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;
(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;
(4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom; shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
(c) Whoever – (1) otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty –
(A) directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person; (
2) directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person's absence therefrom;
(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person's absence therefrom; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.
(d) Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection
(c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and testifying.
(e) The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this title.
– See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/11/201#sthash.Lqlu70PD.dpuf

cc: Veterans Today – Lee E Wanta
Bureau Chief / Editor
A – 1010 Vienna< Austria – Editor

cc: Kenneth Starr, Esq., et al


Fake News!! CNN & BBC Busted!! ISI Is A Fake Threat!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=km5CJo9JkDI





. . .








No comments :

Post a Comment

Only members (obviously) can comment; no moderation; direct to page.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Popular Posts - All Time